297e66afc1
Use clang-format to correct formatting to be in agreement with the [Google C++ Style Guide](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html). Doing this simplifies the process of accepting changes. Also fixed a few warnings flagged by clang-tidy. PiperOrigin-RevId: 246350737
226 lines
9.1 KiB
Markdown
226 lines
9.1 KiB
Markdown
**LevelDB is a fast key-value storage library written at Google that provides an ordered mapping from string keys to string values.**
|
|
|
|
[](https://travis-ci.org/google/leveldb)
|
|
[](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/pwnall/leveldb)
|
|
|
|
Authors: Sanjay Ghemawat (sanjay@google.com) and Jeff Dean (jeff@google.com)
|
|
|
|
# Features
|
|
|
|
* Keys and values are arbitrary byte arrays.
|
|
* Data is stored sorted by key.
|
|
* Callers can provide a custom comparison function to override the sort order.
|
|
* The basic operations are `Put(key,value)`, `Get(key)`, `Delete(key)`.
|
|
* Multiple changes can be made in one atomic batch.
|
|
* Users can create a transient snapshot to get a consistent view of data.
|
|
* Forward and backward iteration is supported over the data.
|
|
* Data is automatically compressed using the [Snappy compression library](http://google.github.io/snappy/).
|
|
* External activity (file system operations etc.) is relayed through a virtual interface so users can customize the operating system interactions.
|
|
|
|
# Documentation
|
|
|
|
[LevelDB library documentation](https://github.com/google/leveldb/blob/master/doc/index.md) is online and bundled with the source code.
|
|
|
|
# Limitations
|
|
|
|
* This is not a SQL database. It does not have a relational data model, it does not support SQL queries, and it has no support for indexes.
|
|
* Only a single process (possibly multi-threaded) can access a particular database at a time.
|
|
* There is no client-server support builtin to the library. An application that needs such support will have to wrap their own server around the library.
|
|
|
|
# Building
|
|
|
|
This project supports [CMake](https://cmake.org/) out of the box.
|
|
|
|
### Build for POSIX
|
|
|
|
Quick start:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
mkdir -p build && cd build
|
|
cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release .. && cmake --build .
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Building for Windows
|
|
|
|
First generate the Visual Studio 2017 project/solution files:
|
|
|
|
```cmd
|
|
mkdir build
|
|
cd build
|
|
cmake -G "Visual Studio 15" ..
|
|
```
|
|
The default default will build for x86. For 64-bit run:
|
|
|
|
```cmd
|
|
cmake -G "Visual Studio 15 Win64" ..
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
To compile the Windows solution from the command-line:
|
|
|
|
```cmd
|
|
devenv /build Debug leveldb.sln
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
or open leveldb.sln in Visual Studio and build from within.
|
|
|
|
Please see the CMake documentation and `CMakeLists.txt` for more advanced usage.
|
|
|
|
# Contributing to the leveldb Project
|
|
|
|
The leveldb project welcomes contributions. leveldb's primary goal is to be
|
|
a reliable and fast key/value store. Changes that are in line with the
|
|
features/limitations outlined above, and meet the requirements below,
|
|
will be considered.
|
|
|
|
Contribution requirements:
|
|
|
|
1. **Tested platforms only**. We _generally_ will only accept changes for
|
|
platforms that are compiled and tested. This means POSIX (for Linux and
|
|
macOS) or Windows. Very small changes will sometimes be accepted, but
|
|
consider that more of an exception than the rule.
|
|
|
|
2. **Stable API**. We strive very hard to maintain a stable API. Changes that
|
|
require changes for projects using leveldb _might_ be rejected without
|
|
sufficient benefit to the project.
|
|
|
|
3. **Tests**: All changes must be accompanied by a new (or changed) test, or
|
|
a sufficient explanation as to why a new (or changed) test is not required.
|
|
|
|
4. **Consistent Style**: This project conforms to the
|
|
[Google C++ Style Guide](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html).
|
|
To ensure your changes are properly formatted please run:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
clang-format -i --style=file <file>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Submitting a Pull Request
|
|
|
|
Before any pull request will be accepted the author must first sign a
|
|
Contributor License Agreement (CLA) at https://cla.developers.google.com/.
|
|
|
|
In order to keep the commit timeline linear
|
|
[squash](https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
|
|
your changes down to a single commit and [rebase](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-rebase)
|
|
on google/leveldb/master. This keeps the commit timeline linear and more easily sync'ed
|
|
with the internal repository at Google. More information at GitHub's
|
|
[About Git rebase](https://help.github.com/articles/about-git-rebase/) page.
|
|
|
|
# Performance
|
|
|
|
Here is a performance report (with explanations) from the run of the
|
|
included db_bench program. The results are somewhat noisy, but should
|
|
be enough to get a ballpark performance estimate.
|
|
|
|
## Setup
|
|
|
|
We use a database with a million entries. Each entry has a 16 byte
|
|
key, and a 100 byte value. Values used by the benchmark compress to
|
|
about half their original size.
|
|
|
|
LevelDB: version 1.1
|
|
Date: Sun May 1 12:11:26 2011
|
|
CPU: 4 x Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
|
|
CPUCache: 4096 KB
|
|
Keys: 16 bytes each
|
|
Values: 100 bytes each (50 bytes after compression)
|
|
Entries: 1000000
|
|
Raw Size: 110.6 MB (estimated)
|
|
File Size: 62.9 MB (estimated)
|
|
|
|
## Write performance
|
|
|
|
The "fill" benchmarks create a brand new database, in either
|
|
sequential, or random order. The "fillsync" benchmark flushes data
|
|
from the operating system to the disk after every operation; the other
|
|
write operations leave the data sitting in the operating system buffer
|
|
cache for a while. The "overwrite" benchmark does random writes that
|
|
update existing keys in the database.
|
|
|
|
fillseq : 1.765 micros/op; 62.7 MB/s
|
|
fillsync : 268.409 micros/op; 0.4 MB/s (10000 ops)
|
|
fillrandom : 2.460 micros/op; 45.0 MB/s
|
|
overwrite : 2.380 micros/op; 46.5 MB/s
|
|
|
|
Each "op" above corresponds to a write of a single key/value pair.
|
|
I.e., a random write benchmark goes at approximately 400,000 writes per second.
|
|
|
|
Each "fillsync" operation costs much less (0.3 millisecond)
|
|
than a disk seek (typically 10 milliseconds). We suspect that this is
|
|
because the hard disk itself is buffering the update in its memory and
|
|
responding before the data has been written to the platter. This may
|
|
or may not be safe based on whether or not the hard disk has enough
|
|
power to save its memory in the event of a power failure.
|
|
|
|
## Read performance
|
|
|
|
We list the performance of reading sequentially in both the forward
|
|
and reverse direction, and also the performance of a random lookup.
|
|
Note that the database created by the benchmark is quite small.
|
|
Therefore the report characterizes the performance of leveldb when the
|
|
working set fits in memory. The cost of reading a piece of data that
|
|
is not present in the operating system buffer cache will be dominated
|
|
by the one or two disk seeks needed to fetch the data from disk.
|
|
Write performance will be mostly unaffected by whether or not the
|
|
working set fits in memory.
|
|
|
|
readrandom : 16.677 micros/op; (approximately 60,000 reads per second)
|
|
readseq : 0.476 micros/op; 232.3 MB/s
|
|
readreverse : 0.724 micros/op; 152.9 MB/s
|
|
|
|
LevelDB compacts its underlying storage data in the background to
|
|
improve read performance. The results listed above were done
|
|
immediately after a lot of random writes. The results after
|
|
compactions (which are usually triggered automatically) are better.
|
|
|
|
readrandom : 11.602 micros/op; (approximately 85,000 reads per second)
|
|
readseq : 0.423 micros/op; 261.8 MB/s
|
|
readreverse : 0.663 micros/op; 166.9 MB/s
|
|
|
|
Some of the high cost of reads comes from repeated decompression of blocks
|
|
read from disk. If we supply enough cache to the leveldb so it can hold the
|
|
uncompressed blocks in memory, the read performance improves again:
|
|
|
|
readrandom : 9.775 micros/op; (approximately 100,000 reads per second before compaction)
|
|
readrandom : 5.215 micros/op; (approximately 190,000 reads per second after compaction)
|
|
|
|
## Repository contents
|
|
|
|
See [doc/index.md](doc/index.md) for more explanation. See
|
|
[doc/impl.md](doc/impl.md) for a brief overview of the implementation.
|
|
|
|
The public interface is in include/*.h. Callers should not include or
|
|
rely on the details of any other header files in this package. Those
|
|
internal APIs may be changed without warning.
|
|
|
|
Guide to header files:
|
|
|
|
* **include/db.h**: Main interface to the DB: Start here
|
|
|
|
* **include/options.h**: Control over the behavior of an entire database,
|
|
and also control over the behavior of individual reads and writes.
|
|
|
|
* **include/comparator.h**: Abstraction for user-specified comparison function.
|
|
If you want just bytewise comparison of keys, you can use the default
|
|
comparator, but clients can write their own comparator implementations if they
|
|
want custom ordering (e.g. to handle different character encodings, etc.)
|
|
|
|
* **include/iterator.h**: Interface for iterating over data. You can get
|
|
an iterator from a DB object.
|
|
|
|
* **include/write_batch.h**: Interface for atomically applying multiple
|
|
updates to a database.
|
|
|
|
* **include/slice.h**: A simple module for maintaining a pointer and a
|
|
length into some other byte array.
|
|
|
|
* **include/status.h**: Status is returned from many of the public interfaces
|
|
and is used to report success and various kinds of errors.
|
|
|
|
* **include/env.h**:
|
|
Abstraction of the OS environment. A posix implementation of this interface is
|
|
in util/env_posix.cc
|
|
|
|
* **include/table.h, include/table_builder.h**: Lower-level modules that most
|
|
clients probably won't use directly
|