PiperOrigin-RevId: 705108072 Change-Id: I209e7fb24bd093412dda1cd5eba10e9ccc2306f4
19 KiB
GoogleTest Primer
Introduction: Why GoogleTest?
GoogleTest helps you write better C++ tests.
GoogleTest is a testing framework developed by the Testing Technology team with Google's specific requirements and constraints in mind. Whether you work on Linux, Windows, or a Mac, if you write C++ code, GoogleTest can help you. And it supports any kind of tests, not just unit tests.
So what makes a good test, and how does GoogleTest fit in? We believe:
- Tests should be independent and repeatable. It's a pain to debug a test that succeeds or fails as a result of other tests. GoogleTest isolates the tests by running each of them on a different object. When a test fails, GoogleTest allows you to run it in isolation for quick debugging.
- Tests should be well organized and reflect the structure of the tested code. GoogleTest groups related tests into test suites that can share data and subroutines. This common pattern is easy to recognize and makes tests easy to maintain. Such consistency is especially helpful when people switch projects and start to work on a new code base.
- Tests should be portable and reusable. Google has a lot of code that is platform-neutral; its tests should also be platform-neutral. GoogleTest works on different OSes, with different compilers, with or without exceptions, so GoogleTest tests can work with a variety of configurations.
- When tests fail, they should provide as much information about the problem as possible. GoogleTest doesn't stop at the first test failure. Instead, it only stops the current test and continues with the next. You can also set up tests that report non-fatal failures after which the current test continues. Thus, you can detect and fix multiple bugs in a single run-edit-compile cycle.
- The testing framework should liberate test writers from housekeeping chores and let them focus on the test content. GoogleTest automatically keeps track of all tests defined, and doesn't require the user to enumerate them in order to run them.
- Tests should be fast. With GoogleTest, you can reuse shared resources across tests and pay for the set-up/tear-down only once, without making tests depend on each other.
Since GoogleTest is based on the popular xUnit architecture, you'll feel right at home if you've used JUnit or PyUnit before. If not, it will take you about 10 minutes to learn the basics and get started. So let's go!
Beware of the Nomenclature
{: .callout .note} Note: There might be some confusion arising from different definitions of the terms Test, Test Case and Test Suite, so beware of misunderstanding these.
Historically, GoogleTest started to use the term Test Case for grouping related tests, whereas current publications, including International Software Testing Qualifications Board (ISTQB) materials and various textbooks on software quality, use the term Test Suite for this.
The related term Test, as it is used in GoogleTest, corresponds to the term Test Case of ISTQB and others.
The term Test is commonly of broad enough sense, including ISTQB's definition of Test Case, so it's not much of a problem here. But the term Test Case as was used in Google Test is of contradictory sense and thus confusing.
GoogleTest recently started replacing the term Test Case with Test Suite. The preferred API is TestSuite. The older TestCase API is being slowly deprecated and refactored away.
So please be aware of the different definitions of the terms:
Meaning | GoogleTest Term | ISTQB Term |
---|---|---|
Exercise a particular program path with specific input values and verify the results | TEST() | Test Case |
Basic Concepts
When using GoogleTest, you start by writing assertions, which are statements that check whether a condition is true. An assertion's result can be success, nonfatal failure, or fatal failure. If a fatal failure occurs, it aborts the current function; otherwise the program continues normally.
Tests use assertions to verify the tested code's behavior. If a test crashes or has a failed assertion, then it fails; otherwise it succeeds.
A test suite contains one or many tests. You should group your tests into test suites that reflect the structure of the tested code. When multiple tests in a test suite need to share common objects and subroutines, you can put them into a test fixture class.
A test program can contain multiple test suites.
We'll now explain how to write a test program, starting at the individual assertion level and building up to tests and test suites.
Assertions
GoogleTest assertions are macros that resemble function calls. You test a class or function by making assertions about its behavior. When an assertion fails, GoogleTest prints the assertion's source file and line number location, along with a failure message. You may also supply a custom failure message which will be appended to GoogleTest's message.
The assertions come in pairs that test the same thing but have different effects
on the current function. ASSERT_*
versions generate fatal failures when they
fail, and abort the current function. EXPECT_*
versions generate nonfatal
failures, which don't abort the current function. Usually EXPECT_*
are
preferred, as they allow more than one failure to be reported in a test.
However, you should use ASSERT_*
if it doesn't make sense to continue when the
assertion in question fails.
Since a failed ASSERT_*
returns from the current function immediately,
possibly skipping clean-up code that comes after it, it may cause a space leak.
Depending on the nature of the leak, it may or may not be worth fixing - so keep
this in mind if you get a heap checker error in addition to assertion errors.
To provide a custom failure message, simply stream it into the macro using the
<<
operator or a sequence of such operators. See the following example, using
the ASSERT_EQ
and EXPECT_EQ
macros to
verify value equality:
ASSERT_EQ(x.size(), y.size()) << "Vectors x and y are of unequal length";
for (int i = 0; i < x.size(); ++i) {
EXPECT_EQ(x[i], y[i]) << "Vectors x and y differ at index " << i;
}
Anything that can be streamed to an ostream
can be streamed to an assertion
macro--in particular, C strings and string
objects. If a wide string
(wchar_t*
, TCHAR*
in UNICODE
mode on Windows, or std::wstring
) is
streamed to an assertion, it will be translated to UTF-8 when printed.
GoogleTest provides a collection of assertions for verifying the behavior of your code in various ways. You can check Boolean conditions, compare values based on relational operators, verify string values, floating-point values, and much more. There are even assertions that enable you to verify more complex states by providing custom predicates. For the complete list of assertions provided by GoogleTest, see the Assertions Reference.
Simple Tests
To create a test:
- Use the
TEST()
macro to define and name a test function. These are ordinary C++ functions that don't return a value. - In this function, along with any valid C++ statements you want to include, use the various GoogleTest assertions to check values.
- The test's result is determined by the assertions; if any assertion in the test fails (either fatally or non-fatally), or if the test crashes, the entire test fails. Otherwise, it succeeds.
TEST(TestSuiteName, TestName) {
... test body ...
}
TEST()
arguments go from general to specific. The first argument is the name
of the test suite, and the second argument is the test's name within the test
suite. Both names must be valid C++ identifiers, and they should not contain any
underscores (_
). A test's full name consists of its containing test suite
and its individual name. Tests from different test suites can have the same
individual name.
For example, let's take a simple integer function:
int Factorial(int n); // Returns the factorial of n
A test suite for this function might look like:
// Tests factorial of 0.
TEST(FactorialTest, HandlesZeroInput) {
EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(0), 1);
}
// Tests factorial of positive numbers.
TEST(FactorialTest, HandlesPositiveInput) {
EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(1), 1);
EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(2), 2);
EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(3), 6);
EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(8), 40320);
}
GoogleTest groups the test results by test suites, so logically related tests
should be in the same test suite; in other words, the first argument to their
TEST()
should be the same. In the above example, we have two tests,
HandlesZeroInput
and HandlesPositiveInput
, that belong to the same test
suite FactorialTest
.
When naming your test suites and tests, you should follow the same convention as for naming functions and classes.
Availability: Linux, Windows, Mac.
Test Fixtures: Using the Same Data Configuration for Multiple Tests
If you find yourself writing two or more tests that operate on similar data, you can use a test fixture. This allows you to reuse the same configuration of objects for several different tests.
To create a fixture:
- Derive a class from
testing::Test
. Start its body withprotected:
, as we'll want to access fixture members from sub-classes. - Inside the class, declare any objects you plan to use.
- If necessary, write a default constructor or
SetUp()
function to prepare the objects for each test. A common mistake is to spellSetUp()
asSetup()
with a smallu
- Useoverride
in C++11 to make sure you spelled it correctly. - If necessary, write a destructor or
TearDown()
function to release any resources you allocated inSetUp()
. To learn when you should use the constructor/destructor and when you should useSetUp()/TearDown()
, read the FAQ. - If needed, define subroutines for your tests to share.
When using a fixture, use TEST_F()
instead of TEST()
as it allows you to
access objects and subroutines in the test fixture:
TEST_F(TestFixtureClassName, TestName) {
... test body ...
}
Unlike TEST()
, in TEST_F()
the first argument must be the name of the test
fixture class. (_F
stands for "Fixture"). No test suite name is specified for
this macro.
Unfortunately, the C++ macro system does not allow us to create a single macro that can handle both types of tests. Using the wrong macro causes a compiler error.
Also, you must first define a test fixture class before using it in a
TEST_F()
, or you'll get the compiler error "virtual outside class declaration
".
For each test defined with TEST_F()
, GoogleTest will create a fresh test
fixture at runtime, immediately initialize it via SetUp()
, run the test, clean
up by calling TearDown()
, and then delete the test fixture. Note that
different tests in the same test suite have different test fixture objects, and
GoogleTest always deletes a test fixture before it creates the next one.
GoogleTest does not reuse the same test fixture for multiple tests. Any
changes one test makes to the fixture do not affect other tests.
As an example, let's write tests for a FIFO queue class named Queue
, which has
the following interface:
template <typename E> // E is the element type.
class Queue {
public:
Queue();
void Enqueue(const E& element);
E* Dequeue(); // Returns NULL if the queue is empty.
size_t size() const;
...
};
First, define a fixture class. By convention, you should give it the name
FooTest
where Foo
is the class being tested.
class QueueTest : public testing::Test {
protected:
QueueTest() {
// q0_ remains empty
q1_.Enqueue(1);
q2_.Enqueue(2);
q2_.Enqueue(3);
}
// ~QueueTest() override = default;
Queue<int> q0_;
Queue<int> q1_;
Queue<int> q2_;
};
In this case, we don't need to define a destructor or a TearDown()
method,
because the implicit destructor generated by the compiler will perform all of
the necessary cleanup.
Now we'll write tests using TEST_F()
and this fixture.
TEST_F(QueueTest, IsEmptyInitially) {
EXPECT_EQ(q0_.size(), 0);
}
TEST_F(QueueTest, DequeueWorks) {
int* n = q0_.Dequeue();
EXPECT_EQ(n, nullptr);
n = q1_.Dequeue();
ASSERT_NE(n, nullptr);
EXPECT_EQ(*n, 1);
EXPECT_EQ(q1_.size(), 0);
delete n;
n = q2_.Dequeue();
ASSERT_NE(n, nullptr);
EXPECT_EQ(*n, 2);
EXPECT_EQ(q2_.size(), 1);
delete n;
}
The above uses both ASSERT_*
and EXPECT_*
assertions. The rule of thumb is
to use EXPECT_*
when you want the test to continue to reveal more errors after
the assertion failure, and use ASSERT_*
when continuing after failure doesn't
make sense. For example, the second assertion in the Dequeue
test is
ASSERT_NE(n, nullptr)
, as we need to dereference the pointer n
later, which
would lead to a segfault when n
is NULL
.
When these tests run, the following happens:
- GoogleTest constructs a
QueueTest
object (let's call itt1
). - The first test (
IsEmptyInitially
) runs ont1
. t1
is destructed.- The above steps are repeated on another
QueueTest
object, this time running theDequeueWorks
test.
Availability: Linux, Windows, Mac.
Invoking the Tests
TEST()
and TEST_F()
implicitly register their tests with GoogleTest. So,
unlike with many other C++ testing frameworks, you don't have to re-list all
your defined tests in order to run them.
After defining your tests, you can run them with RUN_ALL_TESTS()
, which
returns 0
if all the tests are successful, or 1
otherwise. Note that
RUN_ALL_TESTS()
runs all tests in your link unit--they can be from different
test suites, or even different source files.
When invoked, the RUN_ALL_TESTS()
macro:
-
Saves the state of all GoogleTest flags.
-
Creates a test fixture object for the first test.
-
Initializes it via
SetUp()
. -
Runs the test on the fixture object.
-
Cleans up the fixture via
TearDown()
. -
Deletes the fixture.
-
Restores the state of all GoogleTest flags.
-
Repeats the above steps for the next test, until all tests have run.
If a fatal failure happens the subsequent steps will be skipped.
{: .callout .important}
IMPORTANT: You must not ignore the return value of
RUN_ALL_TESTS()
, or you will get a compiler error. The rationale for this design is that the automated testing service determines whether a test has passed based on its exit code, not on its stdout/stderr output; thus yourmain()
function must return the value ofRUN_ALL_TESTS()
.Also, you should call
RUN_ALL_TESTS()
only once. Calling it more than once conflicts with some advanced GoogleTest features (e.g., thread-safe death tests) and thus is not supported.
Availability: Linux, Windows, Mac.
Writing the main() Function
Most users should not need to write their own main
function and instead link
with gtest_main
(as opposed to with gtest
), which defines a suitable entry
point. See the end of this section for details. The remainder of this section
should only apply when you need to do something custom before the tests run that
cannot be expressed within the framework of fixtures and test suites.
If you write your own main
function, it should return the value of
RUN_ALL_TESTS()
.
You can start from this boilerplate:
#include "this/package/foo.h"
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
namespace my {
namespace project {
namespace {
// The fixture for testing class Foo.
class FooTest : public testing::Test {
protected:
// You can remove any or all of the following functions if their bodies would
// be empty.
FooTest() {
// You can do set-up work for each test here.
}
~FooTest() override {
// You can do clean-up work that doesn't throw exceptions here.
}
// If the constructor and destructor are not enough for setting up
// and cleaning up each test, you can define the following methods:
void SetUp() override {
// Code here will be called immediately after the constructor (right
// before each test).
}
void TearDown() override {
// Code here will be called immediately after each test (right
// before the destructor).
}
// Class members declared here can be used by all tests in the test suite
// for Foo.
};
// Tests that the Foo::Bar() method does Abc.
TEST_F(FooTest, MethodBarDoesAbc) {
const std::string input_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myinputfile.dat";
const std::string output_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myoutputfile.dat";
Foo f;
EXPECT_EQ(f.Bar(input_filepath, output_filepath), 0);
}
// Tests that Foo does Xyz.
TEST_F(FooTest, DoesXyz) {
// Exercises the Xyz feature of Foo.
}
} // namespace
} // namespace project
} // namespace my
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
}
The testing::InitGoogleTest()
function parses the command line for GoogleTest
flags, and removes all recognized flags. This allows the user to control a test
program's behavior via various flags, which we'll cover in the
AdvancedGuide. You must call this function before calling
RUN_ALL_TESTS()
, or the flags won't be properly initialized.
On Windows, InitGoogleTest()
also works with wide strings, so it can be used
in programs compiled in UNICODE
mode as well.
But maybe you think that writing all those main
functions is too much work? We
agree with you completely, and that's why Google Test provides a basic
implementation of main(). If it fits your needs, then just link your test with
the gtest_main
library and you are good to go.
{: .callout .note}
NOTE: ParseGUnitFlags()
is deprecated in favor of InitGoogleTest()
.
Known Limitations
- Google Test is designed to be thread-safe. The implementation is thread-safe
on systems where the
pthreads
library is available. It is currently unsafe to use Google Test assertions from two threads concurrently on other systems (e.g. Windows). In most tests this is not an issue as usually the assertions are done in the main thread. If you want to help, you can volunteer to implement the necessary synchronization primitives ingtest-port.h
for your platform.