In the 10.12 SDK, x86_state_hdr from <mach/i386/thread_status.h> was
defined as:
struct x86_state_hdr {
int flavor;
int count;
};
This has changed in the 10.13 SDK to:
struct x86_state_hdr {
uint32_t flavor;
uint32_t count;
};
This triggers signedness mismatch errors where these values are used
with CHECK/DCHECK macros and gtest EXPECT/ASSERT macros.
Compatibility with existing and new SDKs must be maintained, so more
casts must be used.
Bug: crashpad:185, crashpad:188
Change-Id: I8844d6a78520430a8b5b90a35403896c3c6cfa37
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/533375
Reviewed-by: Robert Sesek <rsesek@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to
EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify
each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this
traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now
agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments.
This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual,
expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of
the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better
readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!)
conversion tool is
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py,
and “git cl format” cleaned up its output.
EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made
a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected”
value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other
code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ
and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE,
this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where
one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos
can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion.
References:
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison77d6b17338https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713
Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
__has_feature() is a Clang-ism not implemented by GCC.
base/compiler_specific.h provides a HAS_FEATURE() macro that always
returns 0 when __has_feature() is not implemented. Use this macro for
compatibility with GCC and other compilers that do not implement this
Clang extension.
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#has-feature-and-has-extension
For GCC’s Address Sanitizer implementation, test the
__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ macro that it provides as an alternative to
__has_feature(address_sanitizer).
Note that in Chrome builds, ADDRESS_SANITIZER is pushed in by the build
system. The definition of ADDRESS_SANITIZER provides another way for
that macro to be set. It’s supplementary, not exclusive.
cb33b24372/build/config/BUILD.gn (118)
BUG=crashpad:30
Change-Id: I5c3145d29bbc966925369c03a37b1ecb5622a004
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/413109
Reviewed-by: Robert Sesek <rsesek@chromium.org>
Under asan, there are many more instructions than without. The “nearby
PC” check is much less useful, and would likely fail.
TEST=crashpad_client_test CaptureContext.CaptureContext
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1298943003 .
implicit_cast<> only performs a cast in cases where an implicit
conversion would be possible. It’s even safer than static_cast<> It’s an
“explicit implicit” cast, which is not normally necsesary, but is
frequently required when working with the ?: operator, functions like
std::min() and std::max(), and logging and testing macros.
The public style guide does not mention implicit_cast<> only because it
is not part of the standard library, but would otherwise require it in
these situations. Since base does provide implicit_cast<>, it should be
used whenever possible.
The only uses of static_cast<> not converted to implicit_cast<> are
those that require static_cast<>, such as those that assign an integer
constant to a variable of an enum type.
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/700383007
