The pipe handle was being leaked on connections (oops!). On XP this
resulted in the next test's CreateNamedPipe to fail, because the
previous one still existed (because all handles were not closed). More
recent OSs are more forgiving so I got away with the buggy code.
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:50
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1337953003 .
PROCESS_ALL_ACCESS was changed in later SDKs and the newer value fails
when run on XP with ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED. Use the old value to maintain
compatibility with XP.
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:50
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1337133002 .
This replaces the registration server, and adds dispatch to a delegate
on crash requests.
(As you are already aware) we went around in circles on trying to come
up with a slightly-too-fancy threading design. All of them seemed to
have problems when it comes to out of order events, and orderly
shutdown, so I've gone back to something not-too-fancy.
Two named pipe instances (that clients connect to) are created. These
are used only for registration (which should take <1ms), so 2 should be
sufficient to avoid any waits. When a client registers, we duplicate
an event to it, which is used to signal when it wants a dump taken.
The server registers threadpool waits on that event, and also on the
process handle (which will be signalled when the client process exits).
These requests (in particular the taking of the dump) are serviced
on the threadpool, which avoids us needing to manage those threads,
but still allows parallelism in taking dumps. On process termination,
we use an IO Completion Port to post a message back to the main thread
to request cleanup. This complexity is necessary so that we can
unregister the threadpool waits without being on the threadpool, which
we need to do synchronously so that we can be sure that no further
callbacks will execute (and expect to have the client data around
still).
In a followup, I will readd support for DumpWithoutCrashing -- I don't
think it will be too difficult now that we have an orderly way to
clean up client records in the server.
R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org, jschuh@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1,crashpad:45
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002 .
This test was added in https://codereview.chromium.org/1052813002. It
was previously checking the timestamp from in-memory module traversal
vs. the disk mtime. This is flaky (of course) because it depends on
the linker writing the header and closing the file during the same time
quantum. So the bots occasionally failed with:
[ RUN ] ProcessInfo.Self
e:\b\build\slave\chromium_win_dbg\build\crashpad\util\win\process_info_test.cc(86): error: Value of: GetTimestampForModule(GetModuleHandleW(nullptr))
Actual: 1431650338
Expected: modules[0].timestamp
Which is: 1431650337
Instead, use imagehlp to pull the timestamp out of the header so that
it matches the header value that will be the in-memory timestamp.
R=cpu@chromium.orgTBR=mark@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1139103003
Retrieve context and save to thread context. NtQueryInformationThread
is no longer required (right now?) because to retrieve the CONTEXT, the
thread needs to be Suspend/ResumeThread'd anyway, and the return value
of SuspendThread is the previous SuspendCount.
I haven't handle the x86 case yet -- that would ideally be via
Wow64GetThreadContext (I think) but unfortunately that's Vista+, so I'll
likely need to to a bit of fiddling to get that sorted out. (It's actually
likely going to be NtQueryInformationThread again, but one thing at a
time for now.)
R=cpu@chromium.org, rsesek@chromium.orgTBR=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1133203002
The next big piece of functionality in snapshot. There's a bit more
grubbing around in the NT internals than would be nice, and it has
made me start to question the value avoiding MinidumpWriteDump. But
this seems to extract most of the data we need (I haven't pulled
the cpu context yet, but I hope that won't be too hard.)
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1131473005
The main goal was to get the beginnings of module iteration and retrieval
of CrashpadInfo in snapshot. The main change for that is to move
crashpad_info_client_options[_test] down out of mac/.
This also requires adding some of the supporting code of snapshot in
ProcessReaderWin, ProcessSnapshotWin, and ModuleSnapshotWin. These are
partially copied from Mac or stubbed out with lots of TODO annotations.
This is a bit unfortunate, but seemed like the most productive way to
make progress incrementally. That is, it's mostly placeholder at the
moment, but hopefully has the right shape for things to come.
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1052813002
After 9e79ea1da719, it no longer makes sense for crashpad_util_test_lib
to “hide” in util/util_test.gyp. All of util/test is moved to its own
top-level directory, test, which all other test code is allowed to
depend on. test, too, is allowed to depend on all other non-test code.
In a future change, when crashpad_util_test_lib gains a dependency on
crashpad_client, it won’t look so weird for something in util (even
though it’s in util/test) to depend on something in client, because the
thing that needs to depend on client will live in test, not util.
BUG=crashpad:33
R=scottmg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1051533002
This only works 64->64, 32->32, and 64->32. We shouldn't have a
need for 32->64. It will also currently not work if the crash service
is running on Wow64 itself (that is, 32->32, but on an x64 OS). We
should also be able to avoid needing that.
Primarily, this change templatizes the winternl.h process structure
types on word size, so the PEB can be read in a foreign bitsize process.
This also happens to resolve using void* as pointer values into foreign
processes, as they're now all either DWORD or DWORD64 depending on which
traits class is used.
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/981393003
Test code that requires test data should call Paths::TestDataRoot() to
obtain the test data root. This will use the CRASHPAD_TEST_DATA_ROOT
environment variable if set. Otherwise, it will look for test data at
known locations relative to the executable path. If the test data is not
found in any of these locations, it falls back to using the working
directory, the same as the current behavior.
BUG=crashpad:4
TEST=crashpad_util_test Paths.TestDataRoot and others
R=rsesek@chromium.org, scottmg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/992503002
In Chromium, many targets are built, sharing a single output directory.
Collisions are likely. When integrating Crashpad into Chromium, the
ui/snapshot library and Crashpad’s snapshot library were found to
conflict.
This change gives most Crashpad targets a “crashpad_” prefix to avoid
conflicts. All library and test targets are given a target_name with
this prefix. Existing tools are not likely to conflict with anything
else and are not given a prefix.
BUG=crashpad:12
R=rsesek@chromium.org, scottmg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/990553003
Mostly size_t <-> unsigned int warnings, but I also had a mistake in
PROCESS_BASIC_INFORMATION, the pids are 32-on-32 and 64-on-64.
The Windows build is still x86 until https://codereview.chromium.org/981333002/.
I don't think I'll bother maintaining the x86 build for now, though we will probably
need it for x86 OSs in the future. It should be straightforward to revive it once we
need it, and have bots to support it.
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/983103004
This is as a precursor to ProcessReader. Some basic functionality
is included for now, with more to be added later as necessary.
The PEB code is pretty icky -- walking the doubly-linked list
in the target's address space is cumbersome. The alternative
is to use EnumProcessModules. That would work but:
1) needs different APIs for XP and Vista 64+
2) retrieves modules in memory-location order, rather than
initialization order. I felt retrieving them in initialization order
might be useful when detecting third party DLL injections. In the
end, we may want to make both orders available.
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/977003003
