crashpad/util/win/registration_protocol_win.cc

141 lines
5.1 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

win: Crash handler server This replaces the registration server, and adds dispatch to a delegate on crash requests. (As you are already aware) we went around in circles on trying to come up with a slightly-too-fancy threading design. All of them seemed to have problems when it comes to out of order events, and orderly shutdown, so I've gone back to something not-too-fancy. Two named pipe instances (that clients connect to) are created. These are used only for registration (which should take <1ms), so 2 should be sufficient to avoid any waits. When a client registers, we duplicate an event to it, which is used to signal when it wants a dump taken. The server registers threadpool waits on that event, and also on the process handle (which will be signalled when the client process exits). These requests (in particular the taking of the dump) are serviced on the threadpool, which avoids us needing to manage those threads, but still allows parallelism in taking dumps. On process termination, we use an IO Completion Port to post a message back to the main thread to request cleanup. This complexity is necessary so that we can unregister the threadpool waits without being on the threadpool, which we need to do synchronously so that we can be sure that no further callbacks will execute (and expect to have the client data around still). In a followup, I will readd support for DumpWithoutCrashing -- I don't think it will be too difficult now that we have an orderly way to clean up client records in the server. R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org, jschuh@chromium.org BUG=crashpad:1,crashpad:45 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002 .
2015-09-03 11:06:17 -07:00
// Copyright 2015 The Crashpad Authors. All rights reserved.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
#include "util/win/registration_protocol_win.h"
#include <windows.h>
#include <sddl.h>
win: Crash handler server This replaces the registration server, and adds dispatch to a delegate on crash requests. (As you are already aware) we went around in circles on trying to come up with a slightly-too-fancy threading design. All of them seemed to have problems when it comes to out of order events, and orderly shutdown, so I've gone back to something not-too-fancy. Two named pipe instances (that clients connect to) are created. These are used only for registration (which should take <1ms), so 2 should be sufficient to avoid any waits. When a client registers, we duplicate an event to it, which is used to signal when it wants a dump taken. The server registers threadpool waits on that event, and also on the process handle (which will be signalled when the client process exits). These requests (in particular the taking of the dump) are serviced on the threadpool, which avoids us needing to manage those threads, but still allows parallelism in taking dumps. On process termination, we use an IO Completion Port to post a message back to the main thread to request cleanup. This complexity is necessary so that we can unregister the threadpool waits without being on the threadpool, which we need to do synchronously so that we can be sure that no further callbacks will execute (and expect to have the client data around still). In a followup, I will readd support for DumpWithoutCrashing -- I don't think it will be too difficult now that we have an orderly way to clean up client records in the server. R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org, jschuh@chromium.org BUG=crashpad:1,crashpad:45 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002 .
2015-09-03 11:06:17 -07:00
#include "base/logging.h"
#include "util/win/exception_handler_server.h"
#include "util/win/scoped_handle.h"
#include "util/win/scoped_local_alloc.h"
win: Crash handler server This replaces the registration server, and adds dispatch to a delegate on crash requests. (As you are already aware) we went around in circles on trying to come up with a slightly-too-fancy threading design. All of them seemed to have problems when it comes to out of order events, and orderly shutdown, so I've gone back to something not-too-fancy. Two named pipe instances (that clients connect to) are created. These are used only for registration (which should take <1ms), so 2 should be sufficient to avoid any waits. When a client registers, we duplicate an event to it, which is used to signal when it wants a dump taken. The server registers threadpool waits on that event, and also on the process handle (which will be signalled when the client process exits). These requests (in particular the taking of the dump) are serviced on the threadpool, which avoids us needing to manage those threads, but still allows parallelism in taking dumps. On process termination, we use an IO Completion Port to post a message back to the main thread to request cleanup. This complexity is necessary so that we can unregister the threadpool waits without being on the threadpool, which we need to do synchronously so that we can be sure that no further callbacks will execute (and expect to have the client data around still). In a followup, I will readd support for DumpWithoutCrashing -- I don't think it will be too difficult now that we have an orderly way to clean up client records in the server. R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org, jschuh@chromium.org BUG=crashpad:1,crashpad:45 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002 .
2015-09-03 11:06:17 -07:00
namespace crashpad {
bool SendToCrashHandlerServer(const base::string16& pipe_name,
const crashpad::ClientToServerMessage& message,
crashpad::ServerToClientMessage* response) {
// Retry CreateFile() in a loop. If the handler isnt actively waiting in
// ConnectNamedPipe() on a pipe instance because its busy doing something
// else, CreateFile() will fail with ERROR_PIPE_BUSY. WaitNamedPipe() waits
// until a pipe instance is ready, but theres no way to wait for this
// condition and atomically open the client side of the pipe in a single
// operation. CallNamedPipe() implements similar retry logic to this, also in
// user-mode code.
//
// This loop is only intended to retry on ERROR_PIPE_BUSY. Notably, if the
// handler is so lazy that it hasnt even called CreateNamedPipe() yet,
// CreateFile() will fail with ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND, and this function is
// expected to fail without retrying anything. If the handler is started at
// around the same time as its client, something external to this code must be
// done to guarantee correct ordering. When the client starts the handler
// itself, CrashpadClient::StartHandler() provides this synchronization.
for (int tries = 0;;) {
ScopedFileHANDLE pipe(
CreateFile(pipe_name.c_str(),
GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE,
0,
nullptr,
OPEN_EXISTING,
SECURITY_SQOS_PRESENT | SECURITY_IDENTIFICATION,
nullptr));
if (!pipe.is_valid()) {
if (++tries == 5 || GetLastError() != ERROR_PIPE_BUSY) {
PLOG(ERROR) << "CreateFile";
return false;
}
if (!WaitNamedPipe(pipe_name.c_str(), 1000) &&
GetLastError() != ERROR_SEM_TIMEOUT) {
PLOG(ERROR) << "WaitNamedPipe";
return false;
}
win: Crash handler server This replaces the registration server, and adds dispatch to a delegate on crash requests. (As you are already aware) we went around in circles on trying to come up with a slightly-too-fancy threading design. All of them seemed to have problems when it comes to out of order events, and orderly shutdown, so I've gone back to something not-too-fancy. Two named pipe instances (that clients connect to) are created. These are used only for registration (which should take <1ms), so 2 should be sufficient to avoid any waits. When a client registers, we duplicate an event to it, which is used to signal when it wants a dump taken. The server registers threadpool waits on that event, and also on the process handle (which will be signalled when the client process exits). These requests (in particular the taking of the dump) are serviced on the threadpool, which avoids us needing to manage those threads, but still allows parallelism in taking dumps. On process termination, we use an IO Completion Port to post a message back to the main thread to request cleanup. This complexity is necessary so that we can unregister the threadpool waits without being on the threadpool, which we need to do synchronously so that we can be sure that no further callbacks will execute (and expect to have the client data around still). In a followup, I will readd support for DumpWithoutCrashing -- I don't think it will be too difficult now that we have an orderly way to clean up client records in the server. R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org, jschuh@chromium.org BUG=crashpad:1,crashpad:45 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002 .
2015-09-03 11:06:17 -07:00
continue;
}
win: Crash handler server This replaces the registration server, and adds dispatch to a delegate on crash requests. (As you are already aware) we went around in circles on trying to come up with a slightly-too-fancy threading design. All of them seemed to have problems when it comes to out of order events, and orderly shutdown, so I've gone back to something not-too-fancy. Two named pipe instances (that clients connect to) are created. These are used only for registration (which should take <1ms), so 2 should be sufficient to avoid any waits. When a client registers, we duplicate an event to it, which is used to signal when it wants a dump taken. The server registers threadpool waits on that event, and also on the process handle (which will be signalled when the client process exits). These requests (in particular the taking of the dump) are serviced on the threadpool, which avoids us needing to manage those threads, but still allows parallelism in taking dumps. On process termination, we use an IO Completion Port to post a message back to the main thread to request cleanup. This complexity is necessary so that we can unregister the threadpool waits without being on the threadpool, which we need to do synchronously so that we can be sure that no further callbacks will execute (and expect to have the client data around still). In a followup, I will readd support for DumpWithoutCrashing -- I don't think it will be too difficult now that we have an orderly way to clean up client records in the server. R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org, jschuh@chromium.org BUG=crashpad:1,crashpad:45 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002 .
2015-09-03 11:06:17 -07:00
DWORD mode = PIPE_READMODE_MESSAGE;
if (!SetNamedPipeHandleState(pipe.get(), &mode, nullptr, nullptr)) {
win: Crash handler server This replaces the registration server, and adds dispatch to a delegate on crash requests. (As you are already aware) we went around in circles on trying to come up with a slightly-too-fancy threading design. All of them seemed to have problems when it comes to out of order events, and orderly shutdown, so I've gone back to something not-too-fancy. Two named pipe instances (that clients connect to) are created. These are used only for registration (which should take <1ms), so 2 should be sufficient to avoid any waits. When a client registers, we duplicate an event to it, which is used to signal when it wants a dump taken. The server registers threadpool waits on that event, and also on the process handle (which will be signalled when the client process exits). These requests (in particular the taking of the dump) are serviced on the threadpool, which avoids us needing to manage those threads, but still allows parallelism in taking dumps. On process termination, we use an IO Completion Port to post a message back to the main thread to request cleanup. This complexity is necessary so that we can unregister the threadpool waits without being on the threadpool, which we need to do synchronously so that we can be sure that no further callbacks will execute (and expect to have the client data around still). In a followup, I will readd support for DumpWithoutCrashing -- I don't think it will be too difficult now that we have an orderly way to clean up client records in the server. R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org, jschuh@chromium.org BUG=crashpad:1,crashpad:45 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002 .
2015-09-03 11:06:17 -07:00
PLOG(ERROR) << "SetNamedPipeHandleState";
return false;
}
DWORD bytes_read = 0;
BOOL result = TransactNamedPipe(
pipe.get(),
win: Crash handler server This replaces the registration server, and adds dispatch to a delegate on crash requests. (As you are already aware) we went around in circles on trying to come up with a slightly-too-fancy threading design. All of them seemed to have problems when it comes to out of order events, and orderly shutdown, so I've gone back to something not-too-fancy. Two named pipe instances (that clients connect to) are created. These are used only for registration (which should take <1ms), so 2 should be sufficient to avoid any waits. When a client registers, we duplicate an event to it, which is used to signal when it wants a dump taken. The server registers threadpool waits on that event, and also on the process handle (which will be signalled when the client process exits). These requests (in particular the taking of the dump) are serviced on the threadpool, which avoids us needing to manage those threads, but still allows parallelism in taking dumps. On process termination, we use an IO Completion Port to post a message back to the main thread to request cleanup. This complexity is necessary so that we can unregister the threadpool waits without being on the threadpool, which we need to do synchronously so that we can be sure that no further callbacks will execute (and expect to have the client data around still). In a followup, I will readd support for DumpWithoutCrashing -- I don't think it will be too difficult now that we have an orderly way to clean up client records in the server. R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org, jschuh@chromium.org BUG=crashpad:1,crashpad:45 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002 .
2015-09-03 11:06:17 -07:00
// This is [in], but is incorrectly declared non-const.
const_cast<crashpad::ClientToServerMessage*>(&message),
sizeof(message),
response,
sizeof(*response),
&bytes_read,
nullptr);
if (!result) {
PLOG(ERROR) << "TransactNamedPipe";
win: Crash handler server This replaces the registration server, and adds dispatch to a delegate on crash requests. (As you are already aware) we went around in circles on trying to come up with a slightly-too-fancy threading design. All of them seemed to have problems when it comes to out of order events, and orderly shutdown, so I've gone back to something not-too-fancy. Two named pipe instances (that clients connect to) are created. These are used only for registration (which should take <1ms), so 2 should be sufficient to avoid any waits. When a client registers, we duplicate an event to it, which is used to signal when it wants a dump taken. The server registers threadpool waits on that event, and also on the process handle (which will be signalled when the client process exits). These requests (in particular the taking of the dump) are serviced on the threadpool, which avoids us needing to manage those threads, but still allows parallelism in taking dumps. On process termination, we use an IO Completion Port to post a message back to the main thread to request cleanup. This complexity is necessary so that we can unregister the threadpool waits without being on the threadpool, which we need to do synchronously so that we can be sure that no further callbacks will execute (and expect to have the client data around still). In a followup, I will readd support for DumpWithoutCrashing -- I don't think it will be too difficult now that we have an orderly way to clean up client records in the server. R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org, jschuh@chromium.org BUG=crashpad:1,crashpad:45 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002 .
2015-09-03 11:06:17 -07:00
return false;
}
if (bytes_read != sizeof(*response)) {
LOG(ERROR) << "TransactNamedPipe: expected " << sizeof(*response)
<< ", observed " << bytes_read;
win: Crash handler server This replaces the registration server, and adds dispatch to a delegate on crash requests. (As you are already aware) we went around in circles on trying to come up with a slightly-too-fancy threading design. All of them seemed to have problems when it comes to out of order events, and orderly shutdown, so I've gone back to something not-too-fancy. Two named pipe instances (that clients connect to) are created. These are used only for registration (which should take <1ms), so 2 should be sufficient to avoid any waits. When a client registers, we duplicate an event to it, which is used to signal when it wants a dump taken. The server registers threadpool waits on that event, and also on the process handle (which will be signalled when the client process exits). These requests (in particular the taking of the dump) are serviced on the threadpool, which avoids us needing to manage those threads, but still allows parallelism in taking dumps. On process termination, we use an IO Completion Port to post a message back to the main thread to request cleanup. This complexity is necessary so that we can unregister the threadpool waits without being on the threadpool, which we need to do synchronously so that we can be sure that no further callbacks will execute (and expect to have the client data around still). In a followup, I will readd support for DumpWithoutCrashing -- I don't think it will be too difficult now that we have an orderly way to clean up client records in the server. R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org, jschuh@chromium.org BUG=crashpad:1,crashpad:45 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002 .
2015-09-03 11:06:17 -07:00
return false;
}
return true;
}
}
HANDLE CreateNamedPipeInstance(const std::wstring& pipe_name,
bool first_instance) {
SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES security_attributes;
SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES* security_attributes_pointer = nullptr;
ScopedLocalAlloc scoped_sec_desc;
if (first_instance) {
// Pre-Vista does not have integrity levels.
const DWORD version = GetVersion();
const DWORD major_version = LOBYTE(LOWORD(version));
const bool is_vista_or_later = major_version >= 6;
if (is_vista_or_later) {
// Mandatory Label, no ACE flags, no ObjectType, integrity level
// untrusted.
const wchar_t kSddl[] = L"S:(ML;;;;;S-1-16-0)";
PSECURITY_DESCRIPTOR sec_desc;
PCHECK(ConvertStringSecurityDescriptorToSecurityDescriptor(
kSddl, SDDL_REVISION_1, &sec_desc, nullptr))
<< "ConvertStringSecurityDescriptorToSecurityDescriptor";
// Take ownership of the allocated SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR.
scoped_sec_desc.reset(sec_desc);
memset(&security_attributes, 0, sizeof(security_attributes));
security_attributes.nLength = sizeof(SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES);
security_attributes.lpSecurityDescriptor = sec_desc;
security_attributes.bInheritHandle = TRUE;
security_attributes_pointer = &security_attributes;
}
}
return CreateNamedPipe(
pipe_name.c_str(),
PIPE_ACCESS_DUPLEX | (first_instance ? FILE_FLAG_FIRST_PIPE_INSTANCE : 0),
PIPE_TYPE_MESSAGE | PIPE_READMODE_MESSAGE | PIPE_WAIT,
ExceptionHandlerServer::kPipeInstances,
512,
512,
0,
security_attributes_pointer);
}
win: Crash handler server This replaces the registration server, and adds dispatch to a delegate on crash requests. (As you are already aware) we went around in circles on trying to come up with a slightly-too-fancy threading design. All of them seemed to have problems when it comes to out of order events, and orderly shutdown, so I've gone back to something not-too-fancy. Two named pipe instances (that clients connect to) are created. These are used only for registration (which should take <1ms), so 2 should be sufficient to avoid any waits. When a client registers, we duplicate an event to it, which is used to signal when it wants a dump taken. The server registers threadpool waits on that event, and also on the process handle (which will be signalled when the client process exits). These requests (in particular the taking of the dump) are serviced on the threadpool, which avoids us needing to manage those threads, but still allows parallelism in taking dumps. On process termination, we use an IO Completion Port to post a message back to the main thread to request cleanup. This complexity is necessary so that we can unregister the threadpool waits without being on the threadpool, which we need to do synchronously so that we can be sure that no further callbacks will execute (and expect to have the client data around still). In a followup, I will readd support for DumpWithoutCrashing -- I don't think it will be too difficult now that we have an orderly way to clean up client records in the server. R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org, jschuh@chromium.org BUG=crashpad:1,crashpad:45 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002 .
2015-09-03 11:06:17 -07:00
} // namespace crashpad