40 lines
784 B
Plaintext
40 lines
784 B
Plaintext
C ISA2+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+poacquireonce
|
|
|
|
(*
|
|
* Result: Never
|
|
*
|
|
* This litmus test demonstrates that a release-acquire chain suffices
|
|
* to order P0()'s initial write against P2()'s final read. The reason
|
|
* that the release-acquire chain suffices is because in all but one
|
|
* case (P2() to P0()), each process reads from the preceding process's
|
|
* write. In memory-model-speak, there is only one non-reads-from
|
|
* (AKA non-rf) link, so release-acquire is all that is needed.
|
|
*)
|
|
|
|
{}
|
|
|
|
P0(int *x, int *y)
|
|
{
|
|
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
|
|
smp_store_release(y, 1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
P1(int *y, int *z)
|
|
{
|
|
int r0;
|
|
|
|
r0 = smp_load_acquire(y);
|
|
smp_store_release(z, 1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
P2(int *x, int *z)
|
|
{
|
|
int r0;
|
|
int r1;
|
|
|
|
r0 = smp_load_acquire(z);
|
|
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 2:r0=1 /\ 2:r1=0)
|