feat(third_party): add oatpp,googltest,benchmark

third_party/benchmark/docs/reducing_variance.md

@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+# Reducing Variance
+
+<a name="disabling-cpu-frequency-scaling" />
+
+## Disabling CPU Frequency Scaling
+
+If you see this error:
+
+```
+***WARNING*** CPU scaling is enabled, the benchmark real time measurements may be noisy and will incur extra overhead.
+```
+
+you might want to disable the CPU frequency scaling while running the
+benchmark, as well as consider other ways to stabilize the performance of
+your system while benchmarking.
+
+Exactly how to do this depends on the Linux distribution,
+desktop environment, and installed programs.  Specific details are a moving
+target, so we will not attempt to exhaustively document them here.
+
+One simple option is to use the `cpupower` program to change the
+performance governor to "performance".  This tool is maintained along with
+the Linux kernel and provided by your distribution.
+
+It must be run as root, like this:
+
+```bash
+sudo cpupower frequency-set --governor performance
+```
+
+After this you can verify that all CPUs are using the performance governor
+by running this command:
+
+```bash
+cpupower frequency-info -o proc
+```
+
+The benchmarks you subsequently run will have less variance.
+
+<a name="reducing-variance" />
+
+## Reducing Variance in Benchmarks
+
+The Linux CPU frequency governor [discussed
+above](user_guide#disabling-cpu-frequency-scaling) is not the only source
+of noise in benchmarks.  Some, but not all, of the sources of variance
+include:
+
+1. On multi-core machines not all CPUs/CPU cores/CPU threads run the same
+   speed, so running a benchmark one time and then again may give a
+   different result depending on which CPU it ran on.
+2. CPU scaling features that run on the CPU, like Intel's Turbo Boost and
+   AMD Turbo Core and Precision Boost, can temporarily change the CPU
+   frequency even when the using the "performance" governor on Linux.
+3. Context switching between CPUs, or scheduling competition on the CPU the
+   benchmark is running on.
+4. Intel Hyperthreading or AMD SMT causing the same issue as above.
+5. Cache effects caused by code running on other CPUs.
+6. Non-uniform memory architectures (NUMA).
+
+These can cause variance in benchmarks results within a single run
+(`--benchmark_repetitions=N`) or across multiple runs of the benchmark
+program.
+
+Reducing sources of variance is OS and architecture dependent, which is one
+reason some companies maintain machines dedicated to performance testing.
+
+Some of the easier and effective ways of reducing variance on a typical
+Linux workstation are:
+
+1. Use the performance governor as [discussed
+above](user_guide#disabling-cpu-frequency-scaling).
+1. Disable processor boosting by:
+   ```sh
+   echo 0 | sudo tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
+   ```
+   See the Linux kernel's
+   [boost.txt](https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/cpu-freq/boost.txt)
+   for more information.
+2. Set the benchmark program's task affinity to a fixed cpu.  For example:
+   ```sh
+   taskset -c 0 ./mybenchmark
+   ```
+3. Disabling Hyperthreading/SMT.  This can be done in the Bios or using the
+   `/sys` file system (see the LLVM project's [Benchmarking
+   tips](https://llvm.org/docs/Benchmarking.html)).
+4. Close other programs that do non-trivial things based on timers, such as
+   your web browser, desktop environment, etc.
+5. Reduce the working set of your benchmark to fit within the L1 cache, but
+   do be aware that this may lead you to optimize for an unrealistic
+   situation.
+
+Further resources on this topic:
+
+1. The LLVM project's [Benchmarking
+   tips](https://llvm.org/docs/Benchmarking.html).
+1. The Arch Wiki [Cpu frequency
+scaling](https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/CPU_frequency_scaling) page.