protobuf-c/TODO
Robert Edmonds 9eb868d33d TODO: remove 'dispatch-within-dispatch'
it's related to the RPC code, and that's been split out into
protobuf-c-rpc now.
2014-04-04 19:20:51 -04:00

89 lines
3.2 KiB
Plaintext

----------------------
--- IMPORTANT TODO ---
----------------------
- ensure enums are int-size
- per comments on the main page: wire_format_inl.h is now
wire_format_lite_inl.h .. adjust somehow .. possibly write an email
- BUG? shouldn't enum..by_name[] and enum..by_number[] in the generated-code
be static??
--------------------
--- NEEDED TESTS ---
--------------------
- test:
- service method lookups
- out-of-order fields in messages (ie if the number isn't ascending)
- gaps in numbers: check that the number of ranges is correct
- default values
- message unpack alloc failures when allocating new slab
- message unpack alloc failures when allocating unknown field buffers
- packed message corruption.
- meta-todo: get a list of all the unpack errors together to check off
- run gcov
---------------------
--- DOCUMENTATION ---
---------------------
Document:
- services
- check over documentation again
--------------------------
--- LOW PRIORITY STUFF ---
--------------------------
- support Group (whatever it is)
- proper support for extensions
- slot for ranges in descriptor
- extends is implemented as c-style function
whose name is built from the package, the base message type-name
and the member. which takes the base message and returns the
value, if it is found in "unknown_values".
boolean package__extension_member_name__get(Message *message,
type *out);
void package__extension_member_name__set_raw(type in,
ProtobufCUnknownValue *to_init);
------------------------------------
--- EXTREMELY LOW PRIORITY STUFF ---
------------------------------------
- stop using qsort in the code generator: find some c++ish way to do it
----------------------------------------------
--- ISSUES WE ARE PROBABLY GOING TO IGNORE ---
----------------------------------------------
- strings may not contain NULs
-------------------------
--- IDEAS TO CONSIDER ---
-------------------------
- optimization: structures without repeated members could skip
the ScannedMember phase
- optimization: a way to ignore unknown-fields when unpacking
- optimization: certain functions are not well setup for WORDSIZE==64;
especially the int64 routines are inefficient that way.
The best might be an internal #define WORDSIZE (sizeof(long)*8)"
except w/ a real constant there, one that the preprocessor can use.
I think the functions in protobuf-c.c are already tagged.
- lifetime functions for messages:
message__new()
return a new message using an allocator with standard allocation policy
message__unpack_onto(...)
unpack onto an initialized message
message__clear(...)
clears all allocations, does not free the message itself
message__free(...)
free the message.
[yeah, right: after typing it out, i see it's way too complicated]
- switching to pure C.
- Rewrite the code-generator in C, including the parser.
- This would have the huge advantage that we could use ".proto" files
directly, instead of having to invoke the compilers.
- keep in a separate c file for static linking optimziation purposes
- need alignment tests
- the CAVEATS should discuss our structure-packing assumptions