Solution: The Coverity Static Code Analyzer was used on libzmq code and found
many issues with uninitialized member variables, some redefinition of variables
hidding previous instances of same variable name and a couple of functions
where return values were not checked, even though all other occurrences were
checked (e.g. init_size() return).
This commit addresses the following warnings reported on gcc 5.2.1. In
the future, this will help reduce the "noise" and help catch warnings
revealing a serious problem.
It was originally introduce in the refactoring associated with
zeromq/libzmq@da2bc60 (Removing zmq_pollfd as it is replaced by zmq_poller).
8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---
/path/to/libzmq/src/socket_poller.cpp: In member function ‘int zmq::socket_poller_t::add(zmq::socket_base_t*, void*, short int)’:
/path/to/libzmq/src/socket_poller.cpp:92:51: warning: missing initializer for member ‘zmq::socket_poller_t::item_t::pollfd_index’ [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
item_t item = {socket_, 0, user_data_, events_};
^
/path/to/libzmq/src/socket_poller.cpp: In member function ‘int zmq::socket_poller_t::add_fd(zmq::fd_t, void*, short int)’:
/path/to/libzmq/src/socket_poller.cpp:108:50: warning: missing initializer for member ‘zmq::socket_poller_t::item_t::pollfd_index’ [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
item_t item = {NULL, fd_, user_data_, events_};
^
8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---
