2023-06-05 00:16:05 +01:00
|
|
|
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0 */
|
2013-07-21 13:16:47 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
#include "testutil.hpp"
|
|
|
|
#include "testutil_unity.hpp"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <unity.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const size_t services = 5;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void *req;
|
|
|
|
void *rep[services];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void setUp ()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
setup_test_context ();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
char my_endpoint[MAX_SOCKET_STRING];
|
|
|
|
req = test_context_socket (ZMQ_REQ);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int enabled = 1;
|
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS_ERRNO (
|
|
|
|
zmq_setsockopt (req, ZMQ_REQ_RELAXED, &enabled, sizeof (int)));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS_ERRNO (
|
|
|
|
zmq_setsockopt (req, ZMQ_REQ_CORRELATE, &enabled, sizeof (int)));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bind_loopback_ipv4 (req, my_endpoint, sizeof (my_endpoint));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (size_t peer = 0; peer < services; peer++) {
|
|
|
|
rep[peer] = test_context_socket (ZMQ_REP);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS_ERRNO (zmq_connect (rep[peer], my_endpoint));
|
2020-06-27 18:26:09 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// These tests require strict ordering, so wait for the connections to
|
|
|
|
// happen before opening the next, so that messages flow in the
|
|
|
|
// expected direction
|
|
|
|
msleep (SETTLE_TIME);
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void tearDown ()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
test_context_socket_close_zero_linger (req);
|
|
|
|
for (size_t peer = 0; peer < services; peer++)
|
|
|
|
test_context_socket_close_zero_linger (rep[peer]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
teardown_test_context ();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-05-27 07:01:36 -04:00
|
|
|
static void bounce (void *socket_)
|
2016-03-20 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int more;
|
2016-04-02 18:30:35 +02:00
|
|
|
size_t more_size = sizeof (more);
|
2016-03-20 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
do {
|
|
|
|
zmq_msg_t recv_part, sent_part;
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS_ERRNO (zmq_msg_init (&recv_part));
|
2016-03-20 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS_ERRNO (zmq_msg_recv (&recv_part, socket_, 0));
|
2016-03-20 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS_ERRNO (
|
|
|
|
zmq_getsockopt (socket_, ZMQ_RCVMORE, &more, &more_size));
|
2016-03-20 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zmq_msg_init (&sent_part);
|
|
|
|
zmq_msg_copy (&sent_part, &recv_part);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS_ERRNO (
|
|
|
|
zmq_msg_send (&sent_part, socket_, more ? ZMQ_SNDMORE : 0));
|
2016-03-20 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-02 18:30:35 +02:00
|
|
|
zmq_msg_close (&recv_part);
|
2016-03-20 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
} while (more);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-05-27 07:01:36 -04:00
|
|
|
static int get_events (void *socket_)
|
2017-11-08 09:55:14 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int events;
|
|
|
|
size_t events_size = sizeof (events);
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS_ERRNO (
|
|
|
|
zmq_getsockopt (socket_, ZMQ_EVENTS, &events, &events_size));
|
2017-11-08 09:55:14 +01:00
|
|
|
return events;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
void test_case_1 ()
|
2013-07-21 13:16:47 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// Case 1: Second send() before a reply arrives in a pipe.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-08 09:55:14 +01:00
|
|
|
int events = get_events (req);
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL_INT (ZMQ_POLLOUT, events);
|
2017-11-08 09:55:14 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-21 13:16:47 +02:00
|
|
|
// Send a request, ensure it arrives, don't send a reply
|
|
|
|
s_send_seq (req, "A", "B", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
s_recv_seq (rep[0], "A", "B", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-08 09:55:14 +01:00
|
|
|
events = get_events (req);
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL_INT (ZMQ_POLLOUT, events);
|
2017-11-08 09:55:14 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-21 13:16:47 +02:00
|
|
|
// Send another request on the REQ socket
|
|
|
|
s_send_seq (req, "C", "D", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
s_recv_seq (rep[1], "C", "D", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-08 09:55:14 +01:00
|
|
|
events = get_events (req);
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL_INT (ZMQ_POLLOUT, events);
|
2017-11-08 09:55:14 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-21 13:16:47 +02:00
|
|
|
// Send a reply to the first request - that should be discarded by the REQ
|
|
|
|
s_send_seq (rep[0], "WRONG", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Send the expected reply
|
|
|
|
s_send_seq (rep[1], "OK", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
s_recv_seq (req, "OK", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Another standard req-rep cycle, just to check
|
|
|
|
s_send_seq (req, "E", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
s_recv_seq (rep[2], "E", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
s_send_seq (rep[2], "F", "G", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
s_recv_seq (req, "F", "G", SEQ_END);
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-07-21 13:16:47 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
void test_case_2 ()
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-07-21 13:16:47 +02:00
|
|
|
// Case 2: Second send() after a reply is already in a pipe on the REQ.
|
|
|
|
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
// TODO instead of rerunning the previous test cases, only do the relevant parts (or change the peer)
|
|
|
|
test_case_1 ();
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-21 13:16:47 +02:00
|
|
|
// Send a request, ensure it arrives, send a reply
|
|
|
|
s_send_seq (req, "H", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
s_recv_seq (rep[3], "H", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
s_send_seq (rep[3], "BAD", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-02 18:30:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// Wait for message to be there.
|
2016-02-13 14:23:00 +00:00
|
|
|
msleep (SETTLE_TIME);
|
2013-07-21 13:16:47 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Without receiving that reply, send another request on the REQ socket
|
|
|
|
s_send_seq (req, "I", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
s_recv_seq (rep[4], "I", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Send the expected reply
|
|
|
|
s_send_seq (rep[4], "GOOD", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
s_recv_seq (req, "GOOD", SEQ_END);
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-07-21 13:16:47 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
void test_case_3 ()
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-20 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
// Case 3: Check issue #1690. Two send() in a row should not close the
|
|
|
|
// communication pipes. For example pipe from req to rep[0] should not be
|
|
|
|
// closed after executing Case 1. So rep[0] should be the next to receive,
|
|
|
|
// not rep[1].
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO instead of rerunning the previous test cases, only do the relevant parts (or change the peer)
|
|
|
|
test_case_2 ();
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-02 18:30:35 +02:00
|
|
|
s_send_seq (req, "J", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
s_recv_seq (rep[0], "J", SEQ_END);
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-07-21 13:16:47 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
void test_case_4 ()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// TODO this test case does not use the sockets from setUp
|
2016-03-20 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Case 4: Check issue #1695. As messages may pile up before a responder
|
|
|
|
// is available, we check that responses to messages other than the last
|
|
|
|
// sent one are correctly discarded by the REQ pipe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Setup REQ socket as client
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
void *req = test_context_socket (ZMQ_REQ);
|
2016-03-20 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
int enabled = 1;
|
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS_ERRNO (
|
|
|
|
zmq_setsockopt (req, ZMQ_REQ_RELAXED, &enabled, sizeof (int)));
|
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS_ERRNO (
|
|
|
|
zmq_setsockopt (req, ZMQ_REQ_CORRELATE, &enabled, sizeof (int)));
|
2016-03-20 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS_ERRNO (zmq_connect (req, ENDPOINT_0));
|
2016-03-20 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Setup ROUTER socket as server but do not bind it just yet
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
void *router = test_context_socket (ZMQ_ROUTER);
|
2016-03-20 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Send two requests
|
|
|
|
s_send_seq (req, "TO_BE_DISCARDED", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
s_send_seq (req, "TO_BE_ANSWERED", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Bind server allowing it to receive messages
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS_ERRNO (zmq_bind (router, ENDPOINT_0));
|
2016-03-20 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Read the two messages and send them back as is
|
|
|
|
bounce (router);
|
|
|
|
bounce (router);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Read the expected correlated reply. As the ZMQ_REQ_CORRELATE is active,
|
|
|
|
// the expected answer is "TO_BE_ANSWERED", not "TO_BE_DISCARDED".
|
|
|
|
s_recv_seq (req, "TO_BE_ANSWERED", SEQ_END);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
test_context_socket_close_zero_linger (req);
|
|
|
|
test_context_socket_close_zero_linger (router);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-07-21 13:16:47 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
int main ()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
setup_test_environment ();
|
2013-07-21 13:16:47 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-10 06:04:38 -05:00
|
|
|
UNITY_BEGIN ();
|
|
|
|
RUN_TEST (test_case_1);
|
|
|
|
RUN_TEST (test_case_2);
|
|
|
|
RUN_TEST (test_case_3);
|
|
|
|
RUN_TEST (test_case_4);
|
|
|
|
return UNITY_END ();
|
2013-07-21 13:16:47 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|