Use override instead of virtual for destructor
https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html says: "Explicitly annotate overrides of virtual functions or virtual destructors with exactly one of an override or (less frequently) final specifier. Do not use virtual when declaring an override". The mocked class _should_ have a virtual destructor most of the times.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 342082140
Suggest using generic lambdas for composing macros.
Long chains of macros hurt legibility; generic lambdas are an easy way to abbreviate them, but are not an obvious solution to casual users.
Compare:
EXPECT_THAT(f(), ElementsAre(
Property(&MyClass::foo, Property(&OtherClass::bar, Contains("x"))),
Property(&MyClass::foo, Property(&OtherClass::bar, Contains("y"))));
to:
EXPECT_THAT(f(), ElementsAre(HasFooBar("x"), HasFooBar("y")));
PiperOrigin-RevId: 336870137
Please note that changing the default value for a type can make [you]* test.....
Here "you" word doesn't make sense.. rather "your" seems to make it understandable.
Fix DoAll to work with move-only sink arguments.
This changes types of the first n - 1 actions so that they only get a readonly
view of the arguments. The last action will accept move only objects.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 327031893
Fix DoAll to work with move-only sink arguments.
This changes types of the first n - 1 actions so that they only get a readonly
view of the arguments. The last action will accept move only objects.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 324619666
Fix DoAll to work with move-only sink arguments.
This changes types of the first n - 1 actions so that they only get a readonly
view of the arguments. The last action will accept move only objects.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 324600664
gMock Cookbook: Fix incorrect comment about EXPECT priority order
It's actually the last matching expectation that's used, not the first.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 316490770
gMock Cookbook: Slight rewording
Remove "I" because documentation can have multiple authors. And remove unnecessary "guy".
PiperOrigin-RevId: 314533746
Note that EXPECT_EQ(actual_value, expected_value) or EXPECT_THAT(actual_value, Eq(expected_value)) is preferred over EXPECT_THAT(actual_value, expected_value).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 314350852
Allow construction of an Action from a callable of zero args
Action already allows construction from a callable with the same args as the mocked function, without needing to wrap the callable in Invoke. However, if you don't care about the arguments to the mocked function you need to either accept all of them or wrap your callable in InvokeWithoutArgs. This change makes both of those unnecessary, since it allows you to pass a no-args callable to Action directly.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 296117034
Don't use fully qualified ::std types in code examples.
Having a nested user-defined 'std' namespace anywhere in a program is a minefield and shouldn't be either explicitly supported or implicitly condoned.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 285790182
Clarify use of IsTrue and IsFalse matchers.
These matchers are subtle and confusing: what are they for?
The docs in the code are clear, but not very accessible.
googletest/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-more-matchers.h
PiperOrigin-RevId: 283393275
Add a breadcrumb about nullopt comparison near the Optional() matcher.
Also add a note about how otherwise-spurious 'Eq()' may be needed in some cases. Without this, something like Field(&MyStruct::optional_field_without_equals_equals, absl::nullopt) doesn't work - it converts the nullopt to an optional<> of the non-equalable type, and fails to select the operator==(optional<>, nullopt_t) overload. The Eq() lets the type persist later into the match.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 281305519
Add a matcher `testing::ReturnRoundRobin` which, on each call, returns the next element in the sequence, restarting at the beginning once it has reached the end.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 276312136
Rolling forward IsNan() matcher with fixes in test for -Wconversion issues. Use
std::nanf and std::nanl where appropriate.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 275523003
Move IsFalse/IsTrue to a more appropriate section in the gmock matchers cheat sheet.
I'm assuming their current placement within the "Container Matchers" list is a mistake -- they don't seem to be container related and would fit well with other generic matchers.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 268016027
This line directly contradicts the warning that google mock spits out on unused mock calls:
```
NOTE: You can safely ignore the above warning unless this call should not happen. Do not suppress it by blindly adding an EXPECT_CALL() if you don't mean to enforce the call. See https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#knowing-when-to-expect for details.
```
One or the other should be changed, and I believe the advice in this file is incorrect.
