From the CMake 3.27 release notes:
Compatibility with versions of CMake older than 3.5 is now
deprecated and will be removed from a future version. Calls to
cmake_minimum_required() or cmake_policy() that set the policy
version to an older value now issue a deprecation diagnostic.
This PR also removes manually setting policy CMP0048. This is
redundant since the CMake min is already 3.X
Some versions of MSVC provide incorrect values for the latter and rely on _MSVC_LANG instead.
Fixes#4226.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 527919195
Change-Id: Ifcca4612074f5ebc5337094426866a187f79f90a
The slowdown appears to be due to an implicit conversion of distinct (yet semantically identical) lambdas to `std::function`. Lifting out the lambdas into functors that don't get re-instantiated reduces compilation times by nearly half.
Fixes#4156
PiperOrigin-RevId: 523447948
Change-Id: Ib0ae0761a54d7b1f2b706b14b2858eedf47e2297
This makes the behavior consistent when GTEST_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH is set to zero
and not: there is always vertical whitespace separating failure messages.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 518744611
Change-Id: I5b4af40633849850660504c3f497a76601d4311d
For MSVC, gmock_output_test.py output struct std::pair<int,bool>, for GCC, it's output
std::pair<int, bool>, it's not the same, my intention is getting these to be same by removing
struct for MSVC's outptu, and strip redundant space for GCC.
As a by-product,
```
#ifdef _MSC_VER
#define ERROR_DESC "class std::runtime_error"
#else
#define ERROR_DESC "std::runtime_error"
#endif
```
can be simplified to
```
#define ERROR_DESC "std::runtime_error"
```
Signed-off-by: Yonggang Luo <luoyonggang@gmail.com>
This CL changes the link in the ReportUninterestingCall message from
.../gmock_cook_book.md#knowing-when-to-expect to
.../gmock_cook_book.md#knowing-when-to-expect-useoncall. This is necessary
following https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/31ff597.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 510138974
Change-Id: Ic98c84b07751d27dfc95eddbe7874f76d68b456f
Nothing defines GTEST_USES_PCRE anymore. It was only meant for
internal use, so nothing public should be relying on it:
https://github.com/google/googletest/issues/2735#issuecomment-644849438.
Found when compiling with "-Wundef".
Fixes#2735.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 507823660
Change-Id: Ie19e576ff01dc3b16381338578ece92adccfc09b
Prior to this change we had a mixture of pragmas and
GTEST_DISABLE_MSC_WARNINGS; this change consolidates all instances
to use the macros.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 505786926
Change-Id: I2be8f6304387393995081af42ed32c2ad1bba5a7
warning C4244: 'initializing': conversion from 'int' to 'short', possible
loss of data
PiperOrigin-RevId: 505774670
Change-Id: I3524040334a4b265bae12cfacdd2b615cbb1cfc8
These files were formatted with automated tools. The remaining Python
files require some manual fix ups, so they will be fixed separately.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 504579820
Change-Id: I3923bd414bffe3ded6163ec496cd09ace3951928
In #4113 a user says Max clashes with a macro. Since it is only used in
a test, use std::numeric_limits::max() instead.
Note that in headers, the macro issue can be mitigated with
parenthesis like this: `(std::numeric_limits<T>::max)()`
PiperOrigin-RevId: 504284906
Change-Id: Ibf430caec1a6afdf6b303534fec6a4fd00a6373f
When checked out on Windows, the repo might use \r\n line endings,
and so the golden output has them. Adjust for that.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 502577222
Change-Id: Iabfe537f6d95a49bf6bdcb934e855d28c65f6f89
Clang warns on this pattern because it looks like the author might
have meant to use the value of the first part of the comma operator,
so it warns that it isn't being used. The cast here signals to Clang
that this behavior is intentional.
This was discovered while updating gmock in Android. Clang's -Wcomma
warning is on by default with either -Wall or -Werror, so users of
gmock with those on in combination with -Werror are unable to build
without this fix.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 495655990
Change-Id: Iaf27e2199669f5b6185a877738234e551b6b6556
MatcherDescriberInterface specifies that DescribeTo "should print a verb phrase", but "size ..." is not a verb phrase. Currently, ElementsAre(SizeIs(9)) is described as "has 1 element that size is equal to 9". With this change, it will be described as "has 1 element that has a size that is equal to 9".
PiperOrigin-RevId: 492022324
Change-Id: I4083335f2419462464957521c1e033643b53b763
