Adds mutable_impl() and impl() to PolymorphicMatcher (by Zhanyong Wan); Enables gMock to compile with VC 7.1 (by Vlad Losev).

include/gmock/gmock-matchers.h

@@ -236,6 +236,14 @@ class PolymorphicMatcher {
  public:
   explicit PolymorphicMatcher(const Impl& impl) : impl_(impl) {}
 
+  // Returns a mutable reference to the underlying matcher
+  // implementation object.
+  Impl& mutable_impl() { return impl_; }
+
+  // Returns an immutable reference to the underlying matcher
+  // implementation object.
+  const Impl& impl() const { return impl_; }
+
   template <typename T>
   operator Matcher<T>() const {
     return Matcher<T>(new MonomorphicImpl<T>(impl_));
@@ -273,11 +281,12 @@ class PolymorphicMatcher {
       // doesn't need to customize it.
       ExplainMatchResultTo(impl_, x, os);
     }
+
    private:
     const Impl impl_;
   };
 
-  const Impl impl_;
+  Impl impl_;
 };
 
 // Creates a matcher from its implementation.  This is easier to use

include/gmock/internal/gmock-port.h

@@ -75,33 +75,11 @@
 namespace testing {
 namespace internal {
 
-// For Windows, check the compiler version. At least VS 2005 SP1 is
+// For MS Visual C++, check the compiler version. At least VS 2003 is
 // required to compile Google Mock.
-#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+#if defined(_MSC_VER) && _MSC_VER < 1310
-
+#error "At least Visual C++ 2003 (7.1) is required to compile Google Mock."
-#if _MSC_VER < 1400
+#endif
-#error "At least Visual Studio 2005 SP1 is required to compile Google Mock."
-#elif _MSC_VER == 1400
-
-// Unfortunately there is no unique _MSC_VER number for SP1. So for VS 2005
-// we have to check if it has SP1 by checking whether a bug fixed in SP1
-// is present. The bug in question is
-// http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=101702
-// where the compiler incorrectly reports sizeof(poiter to an array).
-
-class TestForSP1 {
- private:  // GCC complains if x_ is used by sizeof before defining it.
-  static char x_[100];
-  // VS 2005 RTM incorrectly reports sizeof(&x) as 100, and that value
-  // is used to trigger 'invalid negative array size' error. If you
-  // see this error, upgrade to VS 2005 SP1 since Google Mock will not
-  // compile in VS 2005 RTM.
-  static char Google_Mock_requires_Visual_Studio_2005_SP1_or_later_to_compile_[
-      sizeof(&x_) != 100 ? 1 : -1];
-};
-
-#endif  // _MSC_VER
-#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
 
 // Use implicit_cast as a safe version of static_cast or const_cast
 // for upcasting in the type hierarchy (i.e. casting a pointer to Foo

src/gmock-printers.cc

@@ -55,10 +55,12 @@ namespace {
 
 using ::std::ostream;
 
-#ifdef _WIN32_WCE
+#ifdef _WIN32_WCE  // Windows CE does not define _snprintf_s.
 #define snprintf _snprintf
-#elif GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+#elif _MSC_VER >= 1400  // VC 8.0 and later deprecate snprintf and _snprintf.
 #define snprintf _snprintf_s
+#elif _MSC_VER
+#define snprintf _snprintf
 #endif
 
 // Prints a segment of bytes in the given object.

test/gmock-matchers_test.cc

@@ -1784,13 +1784,19 @@ TEST(MatcherAssertionTest, WorksWhenMatcherIsNotSatisfied) {
   // which cannot reference auto variables.
   static int n;
   n = 5;
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_THAT(n, Gt(10)) << "This should fail.",
+
+  // VC++ prior to version 8.0 SP1 has a bug where it will not see any
+  // functions declared in the namespace scope from within nested classes.
+  // EXPECT/ASSERT_(NON)FATAL_FAILURE macros use nested classes so that all
+  // namespace-level functions invoked inside them need to be explicitly
+  // resolved.
+  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_THAT(n, ::testing::Gt(10)),
                        "Value of: n\n"
                        "Expected: is greater than 10\n"
-                       "  Actual: 5\n"
+                       "  Actual: 5");
-                       "This should fail.");
   n = 0;
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_THAT(n, AllOf(Le(7), Ge(5))),
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
+      EXPECT_THAT(n, ::testing::AllOf(::testing::Le(7), ::testing::Ge(5))),
       "Value of: n\n"
       "Expected: (is less than or equal to 7) and "
       "(is greater than or equal to 5)\n"
@@ -1805,11 +1811,11 @@ TEST(MatcherAssertionTest, WorksForByRefArguments) {
   static int n;
   n = 0;
   EXPECT_THAT(n, AllOf(Le(7), Ref(n)));
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_THAT(n, Not(Ref(n))),
+  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_THAT(n, ::testing::Not(::testing::Ref(n))),
                        "Value of: n\n"
                        "Expected: does not reference the variable @");
   // Tests the "Actual" part.
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_THAT(n, Not(Ref(n))),
+  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_THAT(n, ::testing::Not(::testing::Ref(n))),
                        "Actual: 0 (is located @");
 }
 
@@ -2745,7 +2751,6 @@ TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForReferencingCallables) {
   EXPECT_FALSE(matcher3.Matches(n2));
 }
 
-
 class DivisibleByImpl {
  public:
   explicit DivisibleByImpl(int divider) : divider_(divider) {}
@@ -2763,9 +2768,11 @@ class DivisibleByImpl {
     *os << "is not divisible by " << divider_;
   }
 
+  void set_divider(int divider) { divider_ = divider; }
   int divider() const { return divider_; }
+
  private:
-  const int divider_;
+  int divider_;
 };
 
 // For testing using ExplainMatchResultTo() with polymorphic matchers.
@@ -2859,6 +2866,7 @@ TEST(ByRefTest, AllowsNotCopyableValueInMatchers) {
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(n2));
 }
 
+#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
 // Tests ContainerEq with different container types, and
 // different element types.
 
@@ -2927,6 +2935,7 @@ TYPED_TEST(ContainerEqTest, DuplicateDifference) {
   // But in any case there should be no explanation.
   EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(m, test_set));
 }
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
 
 // Tests that mutliple missing values are reported.
 // Using just vector here, so order is predicatble.
@@ -3345,5 +3354,22 @@ TEST(FormatMatcherDescriptionTest,
                                      Strings(params, params + 1)));
 }
 
+// Tests PolymorphicMatcher::mutable_impl().
+TEST(PolymorphicMatcherTest, CanAccessMutableImpl) {
+  PolymorphicMatcher<DivisibleByImpl> m(DivisibleByImpl(42));
+  DivisibleByImpl& impl = m.mutable_impl();
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, impl.divider());
+
+  impl.set_divider(0);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, m.mutable_impl().divider());
+}
+
+// Tests PolymorphicMatcher::impl().
+TEST(PolymorphicMatcherTest, CanAccessImpl) {
+  const PolymorphicMatcher<DivisibleByImpl> m(DivisibleByImpl(42));
+  const DivisibleByImpl& impl = m.impl();
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, impl.divider());
+}
+
 }  // namespace gmock_matchers_test
 }  // namespace testing

test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc

@@ -1432,7 +1432,7 @@ TEST(AfterTest, SucceedsWhenTotalOrderIsSatisfied) {
 #if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
 
 // Calls must be in strict order when specified so.
-TEST(AfterTest, CallsMustBeInStrictOrderWhenSpecifiedSo) {
+TEST(AfterDeathTest, CallsMustBeInStrictOrderWhenSpecifiedSo) {
   MockA a;
   MockB b;
   Expectation e1 = EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1));
@@ -1454,17 +1454,17 @@ TEST(AfterTest, CallsMustBeInStrictOrderWhenSpecifiedSo) {
   // gtest and gmock print messages to stdout, which isn't captured by
   // death tests.  Therefore we have to match with an empty regular
   // expression in all the EXPECT_DEATH()s.
-  EXPECT_DEATH(a.ReturnResult(2), "");
+  EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(a.ReturnResult(2), "");
 
   b.DoB();
-  EXPECT_DEATH(a.ReturnResult(2), "");
+  EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(a.ReturnResult(2), "");
 
   b.DoB();
   a.ReturnResult(2);
 }
 
 // Calls must satisfy the partial order when specified so.
-TEST(AfterTest, CallsMustSatisfyPartialOrderWhenSpecifiedSo) {
+TEST(AfterDeathTest, CallsMustSatisfyPartialOrderWhenSpecifiedSo) {
   MockA a;
   Expectation e = EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1));
   const ExpectationSet es = EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(2));
@@ -1472,17 +1472,17 @@ TEST(AfterTest, CallsMustSatisfyPartialOrderWhenSpecifiedSo) {
       .After(e, es)
       .WillOnce(Return(Result()));
 
-  EXPECT_DEATH(a.ReturnResult(3), "");
+  EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(a.ReturnResult(3), "");
 
   a.DoA(2);
-  EXPECT_DEATH(a.ReturnResult(3), "");
+  EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(a.ReturnResult(3), "");
 
   a.DoA(1);
   a.ReturnResult(3);
 }
 
 // .After() can be combined with .InSequence().
-TEST(AfterTest, CanBeUsedWithInSequence) {
+TEST(AfterDeathTest, CanBeUsedWithInSequence) {
   MockA a;
   Sequence s;
   Expectation e = EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1));
@@ -1492,7 +1492,7 @@ TEST(AfterTest, CanBeUsedWithInSequence) {
       .WillOnce(Return(Result()));
 
   a.DoA(1);
-  EXPECT_DEATH(a.ReturnResult(3), "");
+  EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(a.ReturnResult(3), "");
 
   a.DoA(2);
   a.ReturnResult(3);
@@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@ TEST(AfterTest, AcceptsDuplicatedInput) {
       .WillOnce(Return(Result()));
 
   a.DoA(1);
-  EXPECT_DEATH(a.ReturnResult(3), "");
+  EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(a.ReturnResult(3), "");
 
   a.DoA(2);
   a.ReturnResult(3);