Allowing the client to create its own pipe name string caused a race
between client and server. Instead, in this mode, the server now creates
the pipe name along with a pipe, and returns it to its client via a
--handshake-handle. This guarantees that by the time the client gets the
pipe name, the server has already created it.
Ephemeral mode is now implied by --handshake-handle. The --persistent
option is gone. --persistent mode is enabled when using --pipe-name.
BUG=crashpad:69
R=scottmg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1432563003 .
I considered writing the CodeView records to the minidump, but I didn't
find a ton of docs and debugging is only lightly supported (e.g.
http://www.debuginfo.com/articles/gendebuginfo.html#debuggersandformats
and it doesn't attempt to load at all on more recent Visual Studios).
As we won't be generating symbols in this format, and we don't expect to
have symbols for any weird modules that get injected into us in the
wild, it seems like we don't lose anything by just ignoring them.
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:47
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1430773003 .
I thought I had confirmed that this still allocated and ignored the flag
on older OSs, but I must have not had the PLOG active yet? I'm not sure
what I did. (I might try to blame VMware as it has an annoying habit of
caching old binaries when you use it's "Shared Folders" feature to point
at the dev machine's build dir.)
I confirmed that it does work on Win8 and Win10 but doesn't on Win XP
and Win 7.
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:52
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1405243002 .
Capture the memory for the loader lock (can be inspected by !cs), as
well as all locks that were created with .DebugInfo which can be viewed
with !locks.
e.g.
0:000> !cs ntdll!LdrpLoaderLock
-----------------------------------------
Critical section = 0x778d6410 (ntdll!LdrpLoaderLock+0x0)
DebugInfo = 0x778d6b6c
NOT LOCKED
LockSemaphore = 0x0
SpinCount = 0x04000000
0:000> !locks -v
CritSec ntdll!RtlpProcessHeapsListLock+0 at 778d7620
LockCount NOT LOCKED
RecursionCount 0
OwningThread 0
EntryCount 0
ContentionCount 0
CritSec +7a0248 at 007a0248
LockCount NOT LOCKED
RecursionCount 0
OwningThread 0
EntryCount 0
ContentionCount 0
CritSec crashy_program!g_critical_section_with_debug_info+0 at 01342c48
LockCount NOT LOCKED
RecursionCount 0
OwningThread 0
EntryCount 0
ContentionCount 0
CritSec crashy_program!crashpad::`anonymous namespace'::g_test_critical_section+0 at 01342be0
WaiterWoken No
LockCount 0
RecursionCount 1
OwningThread 34b8
EntryCount 0
ContentionCount 0
*** Locked
Scanned 4 critical sections
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:52
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1392093003 .
This replaces the registration server, and adds dispatch to a delegate
on crash requests.
(As you are already aware) we went around in circles on trying to come
up with a slightly-too-fancy threading design. All of them seemed to
have problems when it comes to out of order events, and orderly
shutdown, so I've gone back to something not-too-fancy.
Two named pipe instances (that clients connect to) are created. These
are used only for registration (which should take <1ms), so 2 should be
sufficient to avoid any waits. When a client registers, we duplicate
an event to it, which is used to signal when it wants a dump taken.
The server registers threadpool waits on that event, and also on the
process handle (which will be signalled when the client process exits).
These requests (in particular the taking of the dump) are serviced
on the threadpool, which avoids us needing to manage those threads,
but still allows parallelism in taking dumps. On process termination,
we use an IO Completion Port to post a message back to the main thread
to request cleanup. This complexity is necessary so that we can
unregister the threadpool waits without being on the threadpool, which
we need to do synchronously so that we can be sure that no further
callbacks will execute (and expect to have the client data around
still).
In a followup, I will readd support for DumpWithoutCrashing -- I don't
think it will be too difficult now that we have an orderly way to
clean up client records in the server.
R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org, jschuh@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1,crashpad:45
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002 .
