If the file just needs the CHECK/CHECK_OP/NOTREACHED
macros, use the appropriate header for that instead.
Or if logging.h is not needed at all, remove it.
This is both a nice cleanup (logging.h is a big header,
and including it unnecessarily has compile-time costs),
and part of the final step towards making logging.h no
longer include check.h and the others.
Bug: chromium:1031540
Change-Id: Ia46806bd95fe498bcf3cf6d2c13ffa4081678043
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/crashpad/crashpad/+/2255361
Reviewed-by: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>
Crashpad has many tests that crash intentionally. Some of these are
gtest death tests, and others arrange for intentional crashes to test
Crashpad’s own crash-catching logic. On macOS, all of the gtest death
tests and some of the other intentional crashes were being logged by
ReportCrash, the system’s crash reporter. Since these reports
corresponded to intentional crashes, they were never useful, and served
only to clutter ~/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports.
Since Crashpad is adept at handling exceptions on its own, this
introduces the “exception swallowing server”,
crashpad_exception_swallower, which is a Mach exception server that
implements a no-op exception handler routine for all exceptions
received. The exception swallowing server is established as the task
handler for EXC_CRASH and EXC_CORPSE_NOTIFY exceptions during gtest
death tests invoked by {ASSERT,EXPECT}_DEATH_{CHECK,CRASH}, and for all
child processes invoked by the Multiprocess test infrastructure. The
exception swallowing server is not in effect at other times, so
unexpected crashes in test code can still be handled by ReportCrash or
another crash reporter.
With this change in place, no new reports are generated in the
user-level ~/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports or the system’s
/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports during a run of Crashpad’s full test
suite on macOS.
Bug: crashpad:33
Change-Id: I13891853a7e25accc30da21fa7ea8bd7d1f3bd2f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/777859
Commit-Queue: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Sesek <rsesek@chromium.org>
These tests:
- InitializationState.InitializationState
- InitializationStateDcheckDeathTest.Destroyed_NotUninitialized
- InitializationStateDcheckDeathTest.Destroyed_NotValid
rely on certain behavior from destroyed objects. This is undefined
behavior and we know it, but the whole point of the of
InitializationState and InitializationStateDcheck destructors is to try
to help catch other parts of the program making use of undefined
behavior.
To make it impossible for the memory that formerly hosted these objects
to be repurposed during tests after the objects are destroyed, these
tests that attempt to work with destroyed objects are changed to use
placement new, so that the lifetimes of the objects can be decoupled
from the lifetimes of the buffers.
Test: crashpad_util_test InitializationState*
Change-Id: Ie972a54116c8b90a21a502d3ba13623583dfac06
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/486383
Reviewed-by: Joshua Peraza <jperaza@chromium.org>
After 9e79ea1da719, it no longer makes sense for crashpad_util_test_lib
to “hide” in util/util_test.gyp. All of util/test is moved to its own
top-level directory, test, which all other test code is allowed to
depend on. test, too, is allowed to depend on all other non-test code.
In a future change, when crashpad_util_test_lib gains a dependency on
crashpad_client, it won’t look so weird for something in util (even
though it’s in util/test) to depend on something in client, because the
thing that needs to depend on client will live in test, not util.
BUG=crashpad:33
R=scottmg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1051533002
Likewise for EXPECT_DEATH_CHECK() and EXPECT_DEATH().
In the in-Chromium build configured for official builds in Release mode,
CHECK() throws away its condition string and stream parameters without
ever printing them, although it still evaluates the condition and
triggers death appropriately. {ASSERT,EXPECT}_DEATH(statement, regex)
will not work correctly for any regex that attempts to match what
CHECK() prints. In these build configurations,
{ASSERT,EXPECT}_DEATH_CHECK() use a match-all regex (""). In other build
configurations, they transparently wrap {ASSERT,EXPECT}_DEATH().
BUG=crashpad:12
R=rsesek@chromium.org, scottmg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/992693003
