7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mark Mentovai
b666bcbe98 win: Use signed int as the integer representation of HANDLEs
HandleToInt() and IntToHandle() use int, a signed type, for the 32-bit
integer representation of HANDLE values. For opaque values, an unsigned
type would normally be used, but in this case, signed was chosen for
sign extension to work correctly. INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE is defined as
((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)-1), and this needs to round-trip through the chosen
integer representation back to the same HANDLE value. Sign extension is
also recommended by
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa384203.

As suggested in
https://codereview.chromium.org/1422503015/diff/1/util/win/handle.cc#newcode24

R=scottmg@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1422023010 .
2015-11-06 15:03:13 -05:00
Mark Mentovai
2eeaa3ac54 win: Add HandleToInt() and IntToHandle()
This consolidates all of the twisted casts and comments that discuss how
HANDLEs are really only 32 bits wide even in 64-bit processes on 64-bit
operating systems into a single location.

R=scottmg@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1422503015 .
2015-11-05 14:00:26 -05:00
Scott Graham
d1e49bd221 Fix CRITICAL_SECTION test
I thought I had confirmed that this still allocated and ignored the flag
on older OSs, but I must have not had the PLOG active yet? I'm not sure
what I did. (I might try to blame VMware as it has an annoying habit of
caching old binaries when you use it's "Shared Folders" feature to point
at the dev machine's build dir.)

I confirmed that it does work on Win8 and Win10 but doesn't on Win XP
and Win 7.

R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:52

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1405243002 .
2015-10-16 14:55:14 -07:00
Scott Graham
4893a9b76d win: Capture some CRITICAL_SECTION debugging data
Capture the memory for the loader lock (can be inspected by !cs), as
well as all locks that were created with .DebugInfo which can be viewed
with !locks.

e.g.

0:000> !cs ntdll!LdrpLoaderLock
-----------------------------------------
Critical section   = 0x778d6410 (ntdll!LdrpLoaderLock+0x0)
DebugInfo          = 0x778d6b6c
NOT LOCKED
LockSemaphore      = 0x0
SpinCount          = 0x04000000

0:000> !locks -v

CritSec ntdll!RtlpProcessHeapsListLock+0 at 778d7620
LockCount          NOT LOCKED
RecursionCount     0
OwningThread       0
EntryCount         0
ContentionCount    0

CritSec +7a0248 at 007a0248
LockCount          NOT LOCKED
RecursionCount     0
OwningThread       0
EntryCount         0
ContentionCount    0

CritSec crashy_program!g_critical_section_with_debug_info+0 at 01342c48
LockCount          NOT LOCKED
RecursionCount     0
OwningThread       0
EntryCount         0
ContentionCount    0

CritSec crashy_program!crashpad::`anonymous namespace'::g_test_critical_section+0 at 01342be0
WaiterWoken        No
LockCount          0
RecursionCount     1
OwningThread       34b8
EntryCount         0
ContentionCount    0
*** Locked

Scanned 4 critical sections

R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:52

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1392093003 .
2015-10-15 13:18:08 -07:00
Scott Graham
475ac81cce win: Implement CRASHPAD_SIMULATE_CRASH()
Windows requires the connection to the handler to do anything, so it
can't really be implemented or tested without CrashpadClient and the
connection machinery.

R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:53

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1356383002 .
2015-09-25 13:45:32 -07:00
Scott Graham
28c5da9080 win: Add version to client registration request
Follow up after suggestion in https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002/.

R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1314683008 .
2015-09-04 11:52:07 -07:00
Scott Graham
6978bf7646 win: Crash handler server
This replaces the registration server, and adds dispatch to a delegate
on crash requests.

(As you are already aware) we went around in circles on trying to come
up with a slightly-too-fancy threading design. All of them seemed to
have problems when it comes to out of order events, and orderly
shutdown, so I've gone back to something not-too-fancy.

Two named pipe instances (that clients connect to) are created. These
are used only for registration (which should take <1ms), so 2 should be
sufficient to avoid any waits. When a client registers, we duplicate
an event to it, which is used to signal when it wants a dump taken.

The server registers threadpool waits on that event, and also on the
process handle (which will be signalled when the client process exits).
These requests (in particular the taking of the dump) are serviced
on the threadpool, which avoids us needing to manage those threads,
but still allows parallelism in taking dumps. On process termination,
we use an IO Completion Port to post a message back to the main thread
to request cleanup. This complexity is necessary so that we can
unregister the threadpool waits without being on the threadpool, which
we need to do synchronously so that we can be sure that no further
callbacks will execute (and expect to have the client data around
still).

In a followup, I will readd support for DumpWithoutCrashing -- I don't
think it will be too difficult now that we have an orderly way to
clean up client records in the server.

R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org, jschuh@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1,crashpad:45

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002 .
2015-09-03 11:06:17 -07:00