- Various "FD" to "Handle"
- Existing Multiprocess implementation moves to _posix.
- Stub implementation for _win.
At the moment, multiprocess_exec_win.cc contains implementations of both
Multiprocess methods and MultiprocessExec functions. This will need more
work in the future, but reflects the idea that all tests should be in
terms of MultiprocessExec eventually.
Currently, this works sufficiently to have util_test succeed (including
multiprocess_exec_test, and the recently ported HTTPTransport tests.)
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1, crashpad:7
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/880763002
off_t exists on Windows, but Seek is implemented in terms of
SetFilePointerEx which expects a LONGLONG, so FileOffset is LONGLONG.
So, use FileOffset in the test code so that it wraps at the expected
value.
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/854883002
d:\src\crashpad\crashpad\util\file\string_file_writer_test.cc(367) : warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion from 'const uint64_t' to 'const off_t', possible loss of data
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/836413004
I started (https://codereview.chromium.org/812403002/) emulating oflag values
on Windows in FileWriter, but it seemed awkward. On the assumption that we're
only likely to need "read a file" and "write a file" this seemed simpler, and
sufficient (but I don't know if that's necessarily true).
Users of open are not yet switched.
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/818433002
Rename fd_io to file_io, and ReadFD to ReadFile, etc.
file_io.cc is the higher level versions that call the basic ReadFile/WriteFile
and then file_io_posix.cc and file_io_win.cc are the implementations of
those functions.
The Windows path is as yet untested, lacking the ability to link the test binary.
R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/811823003
implicit_cast<> only performs a cast in cases where an implicit
conversion would be possible. It’s even safer than static_cast<> It’s an
“explicit implicit” cast, which is not normally necsesary, but is
frequently required when working with the ?: operator, functions like
std::min() and std::max(), and logging and testing macros.
The public style guide does not mention implicit_cast<> only because it
is not part of the standard library, but would otherwise require it in
these situations. Since base does provide implicit_cast<>, it should be
used whenever possible.
The only uses of static_cast<> not converted to implicit_cast<> are
those that require static_cast<>, such as those that assign an integer
constant to a variable of an enum type.
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/700383007
The final range check needs to check that the value fits in a size_t,
because that’s what StringFileWriter uses for its offset_.
TEST=util_test StringFileWriter.SeekInvalid
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/434103003
