4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mark Mentovai
4b450c8137 test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE}
gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to
EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify
each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this
traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now
agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments.

This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual,
expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of
the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better
readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!)
conversion tool is
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py,
and “git cl format” cleaned up its output.

EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made
a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected”
value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other
code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ
and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE,
this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where
one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos
can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion.

References:

https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison
77d6b17338
https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713

Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 12:34:24 +00:00
Scott Graham
6082aed2f2 win: Get Crashpad compiling under VS2015
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1, chromium:440500

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1357833002 .
2015-09-21 10:51:15 -07:00
Scott Graham
d7f90b45b6 win: Fix incorrect thread suspend count due to ScopedProcessSuspend
After https://codereview.chromium.org/1303173011/, the thread suspend
count would be one too large because the count is adjusted when the
process is suspended. Counteract this by passing in whether the
process is suspended or not so that the thread's suspension count
can be adjusted.

Add a test to sanity-check thread suspend count.

R=mark@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1326443007 .
2015-09-09 12:29:29 -07:00
Scott Graham
bcc580e561 win: Add implementation of system_snapshot for Windows
ProcessReaderWin only a stub for now.

R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/936333004
2015-03-02 13:06:34 -08:00