Capture the memory for the loader lock (can be inspected by !cs), as
well as all locks that were created with .DebugInfo which can be viewed
with !locks.
e.g.
0:000> !cs ntdll!LdrpLoaderLock
-----------------------------------------
Critical section = 0x778d6410 (ntdll!LdrpLoaderLock+0x0)
DebugInfo = 0x778d6b6c
NOT LOCKED
LockSemaphore = 0x0
SpinCount = 0x04000000
0:000> !locks -v
CritSec ntdll!RtlpProcessHeapsListLock+0 at 778d7620
LockCount NOT LOCKED
RecursionCount 0
OwningThread 0
EntryCount 0
ContentionCount 0
CritSec +7a0248 at 007a0248
LockCount NOT LOCKED
RecursionCount 0
OwningThread 0
EntryCount 0
ContentionCount 0
CritSec crashy_program!g_critical_section_with_debug_info+0 at 01342c48
LockCount NOT LOCKED
RecursionCount 0
OwningThread 0
EntryCount 0
ContentionCount 0
CritSec crashy_program!crashpad::`anonymous namespace'::g_test_critical_section+0 at 01342be0
WaiterWoken No
LockCount 0
RecursionCount 1
OwningThread 34b8
EntryCount 0
ContentionCount 0
*** Locked
Scanned 4 critical sections
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:52
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1392093003 .
Windows requires the connection to the handler to do anything, so it
can't really be implemented or tested without CrashpadClient and the
connection machinery.
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:53
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1356383002 .
The pipe handle was being leaked on connections (oops!). On XP this
resulted in the next test's CreateNamedPipe to fail, because the
previous one still existed (because all handles were not closed). More
recent OSs are more forgiving so I got away with the buggy code.
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:50
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1337953003 .
PROCESS_ALL_ACCESS was changed in later SDKs and the newer value fails
when run on XP with ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED. Use the old value to maintain
compatibility with XP.
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:50
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1337133002 .
This replaces the registration server, and adds dispatch to a delegate
on crash requests.
(As you are already aware) we went around in circles on trying to come
up with a slightly-too-fancy threading design. All of them seemed to
have problems when it comes to out of order events, and orderly
shutdown, so I've gone back to something not-too-fancy.
Two named pipe instances (that clients connect to) are created. These
are used only for registration (which should take <1ms), so 2 should be
sufficient to avoid any waits. When a client registers, we duplicate
an event to it, which is used to signal when it wants a dump taken.
The server registers threadpool waits on that event, and also on the
process handle (which will be signalled when the client process exits).
These requests (in particular the taking of the dump) are serviced
on the threadpool, which avoids us needing to manage those threads,
but still allows parallelism in taking dumps. On process termination,
we use an IO Completion Port to post a message back to the main thread
to request cleanup. This complexity is necessary so that we can
unregister the threadpool waits without being on the threadpool, which
we need to do synchronously so that we can be sure that no further
callbacks will execute (and expect to have the client data around
still).
In a followup, I will readd support for DumpWithoutCrashing -- I don't
think it will be too difficult now that we have an orderly way to
clean up client records in the server.
R=cpu@chromium.org, mark@chromium.org, jschuh@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1,crashpad:45
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301853002 .
