5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Scott Graham
0208c1a175 fuchsia: Don't capture incorrect/unreasonably large stacks
In a stack overflow test from the Fuchsia tree, an intentional crash was
being induced that at the point it was reported to Crashpad resulted in
a stack pointer outside of the stack. This caused two problems:

- Crashpad attempted to capture that whole "thing" which could have been
  anything, and in the failing test was a 1G guard region
- The whole wrong thing could be very large, resulting in OOM when
  trying to write the minidump, which was the symptom of the bug.

Don't attempt to continue of SP isn't at least in a mapping, and don't
capture too-large regions for the stack as nothing useful can come of
that anyway.

New test added: ProcessSnapshotFuchsiaTest.InvalidStackPointer.

Bug: fuchsia:41212
Change-Id: Ifb48fd8b4b5b2f0cf10ab97e01dbd8b842368775
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/crashpad/crashpad/+/1912942
Commit-Queue: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Francois Rousseau <frousseau@google.com>
2019-11-13 00:26:24 +00:00
Matthew Dempsky
1fc95dc3cc [fuchsia] Add zx_vmo_replace_as_executable to tests
Fuchsia in the future will create VMOs as non-executable (i.e.,
without ZX_RIGHT_EXECUTE) by default, so this necessary preparation
for that.

Change-Id: I00ada804d1d16db4f50ff3882058e382b1845328
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1419778
Reviewed-by: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@chromium.org>
2019-01-22 21:07:06 +00:00
Mark Mentovai
cc166d71f4 Use base::size where appropriate, and ArraySize elsewhere
This is a follow-up to c8a016b99d97, following the post-landing
discussion at
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/crashpad/crashpad/+/1393921/5#message-2058541d8c4505d20a990ab7734cd758e437a5f7

base::size, and std::size that will eventually replace it when C++17 is
assured, does not allow the size of non-static data members to be taken
in constant expression context. The remaining uses of ArraySize are in:

minidump/minidump_exception_writer.cc (×1)
minidump/minidump_system_info_writer.cc (×2, also uses base::size)
snapshot/cpu_context.cc (×4, also uses base::size)
util/misc/arraysize_test.cc (×10, of course)

The first of these occurs when initializing a constexpr variable. All
others are in expressions used with static_assert.

Includes:
Update mini_chromium to 737433ebade4d446643c6c07daae02a67e8deccao

f701716d9546 Add Windows ARM64 build target to mini_chromium
87a95a3d6ac2 Remove the arraysize macro
1f7255ead1f7 Placate MSVC in areas of base::size usage
737433ebade4 Add cast

Bug: chromium:837308
Change-Id: I6a5162654461b1bdd9b7b6864d0d71a734bcde19
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1396108
Commit-Queue: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
2019-01-04 22:42:57 +00:00
Avi Drissman
c8a016b99d Remove base's arraysize from Crashpad.
BUG=837308
R=mark@chromium.org

Change-Id: Ibecbfc7bc2d61ee54bc1114e4b20978adbc77db2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1393921
Reviewed-by: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Avi Drissman <avi@chromium.org>
2019-01-03 19:44:15 +00:00
Scott Graham
8b6f158d20 fuchsia: Include address space information in process snapshot
This plumbs some of the ZX_INFO_PROCESS_MAPS information out into
MINIDUMP_MEMORY_INFO. The mapping loses some information that Zircon
provides, and some of the data that Windows would provide isn't
available (for example, AllocationProtect). But this gives a general
idea of the memory layout of the process to check for bad pointers, etc.
when inspecting crashes.

Bug: fuchsia:DX-615
Change-Id: I2d7c02be0996672253cf0b1eb6a60b0a55e6033b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1377089
Commit-Queue: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
2018-12-14 21:39:06 +00:00