sed -i '' -E -e 's/Copyright (.+) The Crashpad Authors\. All rights reserved\.$/Copyright \1 The Crashpad Authors/' $(git grep -El 'Copyright (.+) The Crashpad Authors\. All rights reserved\.$')
Bug: chromium:1098010
Change-Id: I8d6138469ddbe3d281a5d83f64cf918ec2491611
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/crashpad/crashpad/+/3878262
Reviewed-by: Joshua Peraza <jperaza@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
In a future CL we will make use of InitializeContext2 which can produce
contexts of varying sizes - this makes the existing use of a union for
wow/x64 contexts no longer feasible.
The context union in process_reader_win is replaced with a (moveable,
copyable) helper struct which currently only knows how to allocate
the replaced WOW or CONTEXT sized unions.
As this field is no longer a member of the Thread struct it cannot
be passed into other functions as a reference, so instead a pointer
is used in these functions.
Bug: 1250098
Change-Id: Ied3fe971c0073bbdafc071217e1bb0f72350bb4e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/crashpad/crashpad/+/3538668
Commit-Queue: Alex Gough <ajgo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Joshua Peraza <jperaza@chromium.org>
Chromium moved base::size() to base/cxx17_backports.h, so do the same in
mini_chromium and update the users in Crashpad.
Roll mini_chromium to 2f06f83f to make the new base header available.
Bug: chromium:1210983
Change-Id: Ie3dc4c189dcdfcac030b95fe285f94abb29a27bf
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/crashpad/crashpad/+/2917779
Commit-Queue: Lei Zhang <thestig@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
This is a follow-up to c8a016b99d97, following the post-landing
discussion at
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/crashpad/crashpad/+/1393921/5#message-2058541d8c4505d20a990ab7734cd758e437a5f7
base::size, and std::size that will eventually replace it when C++17 is
assured, does not allow the size of non-static data members to be taken
in constant expression context. The remaining uses of ArraySize are in:
minidump/minidump_exception_writer.cc (×1)
minidump/minidump_system_info_writer.cc (×2, also uses base::size)
snapshot/cpu_context.cc (×4, also uses base::size)
util/misc/arraysize_test.cc (×10, of course)
The first of these occurs when initializing a constexpr variable. All
others are in expressions used with static_assert.
Includes:
Update mini_chromium to 737433ebade4d446643c6c07daae02a67e8deccao
f701716d9546 Add Windows ARM64 build target to mini_chromium
87a95a3d6ac2 Remove the arraysize macro
1f7255ead1f7 Placate MSVC in areas of base::size usage
737433ebade4 Add cast
Bug: chromium:837308
Change-Id: I6a5162654461b1bdd9b7b6864d0d71a734bcde19
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1396108
Commit-Queue: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
These are mostly -Wsign-compare warnings, with a -Wconstant-conversion
and a -Wunguarded-availability thrown in.
Bug: chromium:779790
Change-Id: Ic2103f3332ce57378db83eca7fa2569efec1a7b6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/746081
Reviewed-by: Leonard Mosescu <mosescu@chromium.org>
gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to
EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify
each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this
traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now
agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments.
This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual,
expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of
the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better
readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!)
conversion tool is
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py,
and “git cl format” cleaned up its output.
EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made
a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected”
value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other
code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ
and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE,
this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where
one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos
can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion.
References:
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison77d6b17338https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713
Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
As I was finishing d98a4de718d9, it became evident that fsave
proliferation was becoming a problem. Especially considering tests,
there was much duplicated conversion code. This ties everything up
together in a central location.
test::BytesToHexString() is a new function to ease testing of byte
arrays like x87 registers, without having to loop over each byte.
Some static_asserts are added to verify that complex structures that
need to maintain interoperability don’t grow or shrink. This is used
to check the size of the fxsave and fsave structures, as well as the
MinidumpCPUContext* structures.
BUG=crashpad:162
Change-Id: I1a1be18096ee9be250cbfb2e006adfd08eba8753
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/444004
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
When no SSE (fxsave) context is available but x87 (fsave) context is, use the
x87 context.
This also embeds the x87 FPU opcode from the fxsave fop field in bits 16-26 of
the fsave error_selector field, true to the layout of the fsave structure. See
Intel SDM volume 1 (253665-061) 8.1.10 and figure 8-9.
BUG=crashpad:161
TEST=crashpad_snapshot_test CPUContextX86.*:CPUContextWin.*
Change-Id: I0bf7ed995c152f124166eaa20104d228d3468f76
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/442144
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
A few function implementations that were missing, various switches
for functions/functionality that didn't exist on XP, and far too long
figuring out what exactly was wrong with SYSTEM_PROCESS_INFORMATION
on x86 (the "alignment_for_x86" fields).
R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=crashpad:1, crashpad:50, chromium:531663
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1336823002 .
