crashpad/test/multiprocess_posix_test.cc

296 lines
7.9 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2014 The Crashpad Authors
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
#include "test/multiprocess.h"
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
mac: Tests that crash intentionally shouldn’t go to ReportCrash Crashpad has many tests that crash intentionally. Some of these are gtest death tests, and others arrange for intentional crashes to test Crashpad’s own crash-catching logic. On macOS, all of the gtest death tests and some of the other intentional crashes were being logged by ReportCrash, the system’s crash reporter. Since these reports corresponded to intentional crashes, they were never useful, and served only to clutter ~/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports. Since Crashpad is adept at handling exceptions on its own, this introduces the “exception swallowing server”, crashpad_exception_swallower, which is a Mach exception server that implements a no-op exception handler routine for all exceptions received. The exception swallowing server is established as the task handler for EXC_CRASH and EXC_CORPSE_NOTIFY exceptions during gtest death tests invoked by {ASSERT,EXPECT}_DEATH_{CHECK,CRASH}, and for all child processes invoked by the Multiprocess test infrastructure. The exception swallowing server is not in effect at other times, so unexpected crashes in test code can still be handled by ReportCrash or another crash reporter. With this change in place, no new reports are generated in the user-level ~/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports or the system’s /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports during a run of Crashpad’s full test suite on macOS. Bug: crashpad:33 Change-Id: I13891853a7e25accc30da21fa7ea8bd7d1f3bd2f Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/777859 Commit-Queue: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Robert Sesek <rsesek@chromium.org>
2017-11-20 13:32:26 -05:00
#include "test/gtest_death.h"
#include "util/file/file_io.h"
namespace crashpad {
namespace test {
namespace {
class TestMultiprocess final : public Multiprocess {
public:
TestMultiprocess() : Multiprocess() {}
TestMultiprocess(const TestMultiprocess&) = delete;
TestMultiprocess& operator=(const TestMultiprocess&) = delete;
~TestMultiprocess() {}
private:
// Multiprocess:
void MultiprocessParent() override {
FileHandle read_handle = ReadPipeHandle();
char c;
Make file_io reads more rational and predictable ReadFile() attempted to continue reading after a short read. In most cases, this is fine. However, ReadFile() would keep trying to fill a partially-filled buffer until experiencing a 0-length read(), signaling end-of-file. For certain weird file descriptors like terminal input, EOF is an ephemeral condition, and attempting to read beyond EOF doesn’t actually return 0 (EOF) provided that they remain open, it will block waiting for more input. Consequently, ReadFile() and anything based on ReadFile() had an undocumented and quirky interface, which was that any short read that it returned (not an underlying short read) actually indicated EOF. This facet of ReadFile() was unexpected, so it’s being removed. The new behavior is that ReadFile() will return an underlying short read. The behavior of FileReaderInterface::Read() is updated in accordance with this change. Upon experiencing a short read, the caller can determine the best action. Most callers were already prepared for this behavior. Outside of util/file, only crashpad_database_util properly implemented EOF detection according to previous semantics, and adapting it to new semantics is trivial. Callers who require an exact-length read can use the new ReadFileExactly(), or the newly renamed LoggingReadFileExactly() or CheckedReadFileExactly(). These functions will retry following a short read. The renamed functions were previously called LoggingReadFile() and CheckedReadFile(), but those names implied that they were simply wrapping ReadFile(), which is not the case. They wrapped ReadFile() and further, insisted on a full read. Since ReadFile()’s semantics are now changing but these functions’ are not, they’re now even more distinct from ReadFile(), and must be renamed to avoid confusion. Test: * Change-Id: I06b77e0d6ad8719bd2eb67dab93a8740542dd908 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/456676 Reviewed-by: Robert Sesek <rsesek@chromium.org>
2017-03-16 13:36:38 -04:00
CheckedReadFileExactly(read_handle, &c, 1);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(c, 'M');
pid_t pid;
Make file_io reads more rational and predictable ReadFile() attempted to continue reading after a short read. In most cases, this is fine. However, ReadFile() would keep trying to fill a partially-filled buffer until experiencing a 0-length read(), signaling end-of-file. For certain weird file descriptors like terminal input, EOF is an ephemeral condition, and attempting to read beyond EOF doesn’t actually return 0 (EOF) provided that they remain open, it will block waiting for more input. Consequently, ReadFile() and anything based on ReadFile() had an undocumented and quirky interface, which was that any short read that it returned (not an underlying short read) actually indicated EOF. This facet of ReadFile() was unexpected, so it’s being removed. The new behavior is that ReadFile() will return an underlying short read. The behavior of FileReaderInterface::Read() is updated in accordance with this change. Upon experiencing a short read, the caller can determine the best action. Most callers were already prepared for this behavior. Outside of util/file, only crashpad_database_util properly implemented EOF detection according to previous semantics, and adapting it to new semantics is trivial. Callers who require an exact-length read can use the new ReadFileExactly(), or the newly renamed LoggingReadFileExactly() or CheckedReadFileExactly(). These functions will retry following a short read. The renamed functions were previously called LoggingReadFile() and CheckedReadFile(), but those names implied that they were simply wrapping ReadFile(), which is not the case. They wrapped ReadFile() and further, insisted on a full read. Since ReadFile()’s semantics are now changing but these functions’ are not, they’re now even more distinct from ReadFile(), and must be renamed to avoid confusion. Test: * Change-Id: I06b77e0d6ad8719bd2eb67dab93a8740542dd908 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/456676 Reviewed-by: Robert Sesek <rsesek@chromium.org>
2017-03-16 13:36:38 -04:00
CheckedReadFileExactly(read_handle, &pid, sizeof(pid));
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(ChildPID(), pid);
c = 'm';
CheckedWriteFile(WritePipeHandle(), &c, 1);
// The child will close its end of the pipe and exit. Make sure that the
// parent sees EOF.
CheckedReadFileAtEOF(read_handle);
}
void MultiprocessChild() override {
FileHandle write_handle = WritePipeHandle();
char c = 'M';
CheckedWriteFile(write_handle, &c, 1);
pid_t pid = getpid();
CheckedWriteFile(write_handle, &pid, sizeof(pid));
Make file_io reads more rational and predictable ReadFile() attempted to continue reading after a short read. In most cases, this is fine. However, ReadFile() would keep trying to fill a partially-filled buffer until experiencing a 0-length read(), signaling end-of-file. For certain weird file descriptors like terminal input, EOF is an ephemeral condition, and attempting to read beyond EOF doesn’t actually return 0 (EOF) provided that they remain open, it will block waiting for more input. Consequently, ReadFile() and anything based on ReadFile() had an undocumented and quirky interface, which was that any short read that it returned (not an underlying short read) actually indicated EOF. This facet of ReadFile() was unexpected, so it’s being removed. The new behavior is that ReadFile() will return an underlying short read. The behavior of FileReaderInterface::Read() is updated in accordance with this change. Upon experiencing a short read, the caller can determine the best action. Most callers were already prepared for this behavior. Outside of util/file, only crashpad_database_util properly implemented EOF detection according to previous semantics, and adapting it to new semantics is trivial. Callers who require an exact-length read can use the new ReadFileExactly(), or the newly renamed LoggingReadFileExactly() or CheckedReadFileExactly(). These functions will retry following a short read. The renamed functions were previously called LoggingReadFile() and CheckedReadFile(), but those names implied that they were simply wrapping ReadFile(), which is not the case. They wrapped ReadFile() and further, insisted on a full read. Since ReadFile()’s semantics are now changing but these functions’ are not, they’re now even more distinct from ReadFile(), and must be renamed to avoid confusion. Test: * Change-Id: I06b77e0d6ad8719bd2eb67dab93a8740542dd908 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/456676 Reviewed-by: Robert Sesek <rsesek@chromium.org>
2017-03-16 13:36:38 -04:00
CheckedReadFileExactly(ReadPipeHandle(), &c, 1);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(c, 'm');
}
};
TEST(Multiprocess, Multiprocess) {
TestMultiprocess multiprocess;
multiprocess.Run();
}
class TestMultiprocessUnclean final : public Multiprocess {
public:
enum TerminationType {
kExitSuccess = 0,
kExitFailure,
kExit2,
kAbort,
};
explicit TestMultiprocessUnclean(TerminationType type)
: Multiprocess(),
type_(type) {
if (type_ == kAbort) {
SetExpectedChildTermination(kTerminationSignal, SIGABRT);
} else {
SetExpectedChildTermination(kTerminationNormal, ExitCode());
}
}
TestMultiprocessUnclean(const TestMultiprocessUnclean&) = delete;
TestMultiprocessUnclean& operator=(const TestMultiprocessUnclean&) = delete;
~TestMultiprocessUnclean() {}
private:
int ExitCode() const {
return type_;
}
// Multiprocess:
void MultiprocessParent() override {
}
void MultiprocessChild() override {
if (type_ == kAbort) {
abort();
} else {
_exit(ExitCode());
}
}
TerminationType type_;
};
TEST(Multiprocess, SuccessfulExit) {
TestMultiprocessUnclean multiprocess(TestMultiprocessUnclean::kExitSuccess);
multiprocess.Run();
}
TEST(Multiprocess, UnsuccessfulExit) {
TestMultiprocessUnclean multiprocess(TestMultiprocessUnclean::kExitFailure);
multiprocess.Run();
}
TEST(Multiprocess, Exit2) {
TestMultiprocessUnclean multiprocess(TestMultiprocessUnclean::kExit2);
multiprocess.Run();
}
TEST(Multiprocess, AbortSignal) {
TestMultiprocessUnclean multiprocess(TestMultiprocessUnclean::kAbort);
multiprocess.Run();
}
class TestMultiprocessClosePipe final : public Multiprocess {
public:
enum WhoCloses {
kParentCloses = 0,
kChildCloses,
};
enum WhatCloses {
kReadCloses = 0,
kWriteCloses,
kReadAndWriteClose,
};
TestMultiprocessClosePipe(WhoCloses who_closes, WhatCloses what_closes)
: Multiprocess(),
who_closes_(who_closes),
what_closes_(what_closes) {
// Fails under "threadsafe" mode on macOS 10.11.
GTEST_FLAG_SET(death_test_style, "fast");
}
TestMultiprocessClosePipe(const TestMultiprocessClosePipe&) = delete;
TestMultiprocessClosePipe& operator=(const TestMultiprocessClosePipe&) =
delete;
~TestMultiprocessClosePipe() {}
private:
void VerifyInitial() {
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
ASSERT_NE(ReadPipeHandle(), -1);
ASSERT_NE(WritePipeHandle(), -1);
}
// Verifies that the partner process did what it was supposed to do. This must
// only be called when who_closes_ names the partner process, not this
// process.
//
// If the partner was supposed to close its write pipe, the read pipe will be
// checked to ensure that it shows end-of-file.
//
// If the partner was supposed to close its read pipe, the write pipe will be
// checked to ensure that a checked write causes death. This can only be done
// if the partner also provides some type of signal when it has closed its
// read pipe, which is done in the form of it closing its write pipe, causing
// the read pipe in this process to show end-of-file.
void VerifyPartner() {
if (what_closes_ == kWriteCloses) {
CheckedReadFileAtEOF(ReadPipeHandle());
} else if (what_closes_ == kReadAndWriteClose) {
CheckedReadFileAtEOF(ReadPipeHandle());
char c = '\0';
// This will raise SIGPIPE. If fatal (the normal case), that will cause
// process termination. If SIGPIPE is being handled somewhere, the write
// will still fail and set errno to EPIPE, and CheckedWriteFile() will
// abort execution. Regardless of how SIGPIPE is handled, the process will
// be terminated. Because the actual termination mechanism is not known,
// no regex can be specified.
EXPECT_DEATH_CHECK(CheckedWriteFile(WritePipeHandle(), &c, 1), "");
}
}
void Close() {
switch (what_closes_) {
case kReadCloses:
CloseReadPipe();
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_NE(WritePipeHandle(), -1);
EXPECT_DEATH_CHECK(ReadPipeHandle(), "fd");
break;
case kWriteCloses:
CloseWritePipe();
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_NE(ReadPipeHandle(), -1);
EXPECT_DEATH_CHECK(WritePipeHandle(), "fd");
break;
case kReadAndWriteClose:
CloseReadPipe();
CloseWritePipe();
EXPECT_DEATH_CHECK(ReadPipeHandle(), "fd");
EXPECT_DEATH_CHECK(WritePipeHandle(), "fd");
break;
}
}
// Multiprocess:
void MultiprocessParent() override {
ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(VerifyInitial());
if (who_closes_ == kParentCloses) {
Close();
} else {
VerifyPartner();
}
}
void MultiprocessChild() override {
ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(VerifyInitial());
if (who_closes_ == kChildCloses) {
Close();
} else {
VerifyPartner();
}
}
WhoCloses who_closes_;
WhatCloses what_closes_;
};
TEST(MultiprocessDeathTest, ParentClosesReadPipe) {
TestMultiprocessClosePipe multiprocess(
TestMultiprocessClosePipe::kParentCloses,
TestMultiprocessClosePipe::kReadCloses);
multiprocess.Run();
}
TEST(MultiprocessDeathTest, ParentClosesWritePipe) {
TestMultiprocessClosePipe multiprocess(
TestMultiprocessClosePipe::kParentCloses,
TestMultiprocessClosePipe::kWriteCloses);
multiprocess.Run();
}
TEST(MultiprocessDeathTest, ParentClosesReadAndWritePipe) {
TestMultiprocessClosePipe multiprocess(
TestMultiprocessClosePipe::kParentCloses,
TestMultiprocessClosePipe::kReadAndWriteClose);
multiprocess.Run();
}
TEST(MultiprocessDeathTest, ChildClosesReadPipe) {
TestMultiprocessClosePipe multiprocess(
TestMultiprocessClosePipe::kChildCloses,
TestMultiprocessClosePipe::kReadCloses);
multiprocess.Run();
}
TEST(MultiprocessDeathTest, ChildClosesWritePipe) {
TestMultiprocessClosePipe multiprocess(
TestMultiprocessClosePipe::kChildCloses,
TestMultiprocessClosePipe::kWriteCloses);
multiprocess.Run();
}
TEST(MultiprocessDeathTest, ChildClosesReadAndWritePipe) {
TestMultiprocessClosePipe multiprocess(
TestMultiprocessClosePipe::kChildCloses,
TestMultiprocessClosePipe::kReadAndWriteClose);
multiprocess.Run();
}
} // namespace
} // namespace test
} // namespace crashpad