crashpad/util/net/http_multipart_builder_test.cc

298 lines
10 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2014 The Crashpad Authors
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
#include "util/net/http_multipart_builder.h"
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <vector>
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
mac: Tests that crash intentionally shouldn’t go to ReportCrash Crashpad has many tests that crash intentionally. Some of these are gtest death tests, and others arrange for intentional crashes to test Crashpad’s own crash-catching logic. On macOS, all of the gtest death tests and some of the other intentional crashes were being logged by ReportCrash, the system’s crash reporter. Since these reports corresponded to intentional crashes, they were never useful, and served only to clutter ~/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports. Since Crashpad is adept at handling exceptions on its own, this introduces the “exception swallowing server”, crashpad_exception_swallower, which is a Mach exception server that implements a no-op exception handler routine for all exceptions received. The exception swallowing server is established as the task handler for EXC_CRASH and EXC_CORPSE_NOTIFY exceptions during gtest death tests invoked by {ASSERT,EXPECT}_DEATH_{CHECK,CRASH}, and for all child processes invoked by the Multiprocess test infrastructure. The exception swallowing server is not in effect at other times, so unexpected crashes in test code can still be handled by ReportCrash or another crash reporter. With this change in place, no new reports are generated in the user-level ~/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports or the system’s /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports during a run of Crashpad’s full test suite on macOS. Bug: crashpad:33 Change-Id: I13891853a7e25accc30da21fa7ea8bd7d1f3bd2f Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/777859 Commit-Queue: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Robert Sesek <rsesek@chromium.org>
2017-11-20 13:32:26 -05:00
#include "test/gtest_death.h"
#include "test/test_paths.h"
#include "util/net/http_body.h"
#include "util/net/http_body_test_util.h"
namespace crashpad {
namespace test {
namespace {
std::vector<std::string> SplitCRLF(const std::string& string) {
std::vector<std::string> lines;
size_t last_line = 0;
for (size_t i = 0; i < string.length(); ++i) {
if (string[i] == '\r' && i+1 < string.length() && string[i+1] == '\n') {
lines.push_back(string.substr(last_line, i - last_line));
last_line = i + 2;
++i;
}
}
// Append any remainder.
if (last_line < string.length()) {
lines.push_back(string.substr(last_line));
}
return lines;
}
// In the tests below, the form data pairs dont appear in the order they were
// added. The current implementation uses a std::map which sorts keys, so the
// entires appear in alphabetical order. However, this is an implementation
// detail, and its OK if the writer stops sorting in this order. Testing for
// a specific order is just the easiest way to write this test while the writer
// will output things in a known order.
TEST(HTTPMultipartBuilder, ThreeStringFields) {
HTTPMultipartBuilder builder;
static constexpr char kKey1[] = "key1";
static constexpr char kValue1[] = "test";
builder.SetFormData(kKey1, kValue1);
static constexpr char kKey2[] = "key2";
static constexpr char kValue2[] = "This is another test.";
builder.SetFormData(kKey2, kValue2);
static constexpr char kKey3[] = "key-three";
static constexpr char kValue3[] = "More tests";
builder.SetFormData(kKey3, kValue3);
std::unique_ptr<HTTPBodyStream> body(builder.GetBodyStream());
ASSERT_TRUE(body.get());
std::string contents = ReadStreamToString(body.get());
auto lines = SplitCRLF(contents);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
ASSERT_EQ(lines.size(), 13u);
auto lines_it = lines.begin();
// The first line is the boundary. All subsequent boundaries must match this.
const std::string& boundary = *lines_it++;
EXPECT_GE(boundary.length(), 1u);
EXPECT_LE(boundary.length(), 70u);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"key-three\"");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, kValue3);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, boundary);
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"key1\"");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, kValue1);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, boundary);
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"key2\"");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, kValue2);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, boundary + "--");
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(lines_it, lines.end());
}
TEST(HTTPMultipartBuilder, ThreeFileAttachments) {
HTTPMultipartBuilder builder;
base::FilePath ascii_http_body_path = TestPaths::TestDataRoot().Append(
FILE_PATH_LITERAL("util/net/testdata/ascii_http_body.txt"));
FileReader reader1;
ASSERT_TRUE(reader1.Open(ascii_http_body_path));
builder.SetFileAttachment("first", "minidump.dmp", &reader1, "");
FileReader reader2;
ASSERT_TRUE(reader2.Open(ascii_http_body_path));
builder.SetFileAttachment("second", "minidump.dmp", &reader2, "text/plain");
FileReader reader3;
ASSERT_TRUE(reader3.Open(ascii_http_body_path));
builder.SetFileAttachment(
"\"third 50% silly\"", "test%foo.txt", &reader3, "text/plain");
static constexpr char kFileContents[] = "This is a test.\n";
std::unique_ptr<HTTPBodyStream> body(builder.GetBodyStream());
ASSERT_TRUE(body.get());
std::string contents = ReadStreamToString(body.get());
auto lines = SplitCRLF(contents);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
ASSERT_EQ(lines.size(), 16u);
auto lines_it = lines.begin();
const std::string& boundary = *lines_it++;
EXPECT_GE(boundary.length(), 1u);
EXPECT_LE(boundary.length(), 70u);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++,
"Content-Disposition: form-data; "
"name=\"%22third 50%25 silly%22\"; filename=\"test%25foo.txt\"");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "Content-Type: text/plain");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, kFileContents);
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, boundary);
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++,
"Content-Disposition: form-data; "
"name=\"first\"; filename=\"minidump.dmp\"");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "Content-Type: application/octet-stream");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, kFileContents);
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, boundary);
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++,
"Content-Disposition: form-data; "
"name=\"second\"; filename=\"minidump.dmp\"");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "Content-Type: text/plain");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, kFileContents);
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, boundary + "--");
EXPECT_EQ(lines_it, lines.end());
}
TEST(HTTPMultipartBuilder, OverwriteFormDataWithEscapedKey) {
HTTPMultipartBuilder builder;
static constexpr char kKey[] = "a 100% \"silly\"\r\ntest";
builder.SetFormData(kKey, "some dummy value");
builder.SetFormData(kKey, "overwrite");
std::unique_ptr<HTTPBodyStream> body(builder.GetBodyStream());
ASSERT_TRUE(body.get());
std::string contents = ReadStreamToString(body.get());
auto lines = SplitCRLF(contents);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
ASSERT_EQ(lines.size(), 5u);
auto lines_it = lines.begin();
const std::string& boundary = *lines_it++;
EXPECT_GE(boundary.length(), 1u);
EXPECT_LE(boundary.length(), 70u);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++,
"Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"a 100%25 "
"%22silly%22%0d%0atest\"");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "overwrite");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, boundary + "--");
EXPECT_EQ(lines_it, lines.end());
}
TEST(HTTPMultipartBuilder, OverwriteFileAttachment) {
HTTPMultipartBuilder builder;
static constexpr char kValue[] = "1 2 3 test";
builder.SetFormData("a key", kValue);
base::FilePath testdata_path =
TestPaths::TestDataRoot().Append(FILE_PATH_LITERAL("util/net/testdata"));
FileReader reader1;
ASSERT_TRUE(reader1.Open(
testdata_path.Append(FILE_PATH_LITERAL("binary_http_body.dat"))));
builder.SetFileAttachment("minidump", "minidump.dmp", &reader1, "");
FileReader reader2;
ASSERT_TRUE(reader2.Open(
testdata_path.Append(FILE_PATH_LITERAL("binary_http_body.dat"))));
builder.SetFileAttachment("minidump2", "minidump.dmp", &reader2, "");
FileReader reader3;
ASSERT_TRUE(reader3.Open(
testdata_path.Append(FILE_PATH_LITERAL("ascii_http_body.txt"))));
builder.SetFileAttachment("minidump", "minidump.dmp", &reader3, "text/plain");
std::unique_ptr<HTTPBodyStream> body(builder.GetBodyStream());
ASSERT_TRUE(body.get());
std::string contents = ReadStreamToString(body.get());
auto lines = SplitCRLF(contents);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
ASSERT_EQ(lines.size(), 15u);
auto lines_it = lines.begin();
const std::string& boundary = *lines_it++;
EXPECT_GE(boundary.length(), 1u);
EXPECT_LE(boundary.length(), 70u);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"a key\"");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, kValue);
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, boundary);
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++,
"Content-Disposition: form-data; "
"name=\"minidump\"; filename=\"minidump.dmp\"");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "Content-Type: text/plain");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "This is a test.\n");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, boundary);
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++,
"Content-Disposition: form-data; "
"name=\"minidump2\"; filename=\"minidump.dmp\"");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "Content-Type: application/octet-stream");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "\xFE\xED\xFA\xCE\xA1\x1A\x15");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, boundary + "--");
EXPECT_EQ(lines_it, lines.end());
}
TEST(HTTPMultipartBuilder, SharedFormDataAndAttachmentKeyNamespace) {
HTTPMultipartBuilder builder;
static constexpr char kValue1[] = "11111";
builder.SetFormData("one", kValue1);
base::FilePath ascii_http_body_path = TestPaths::TestDataRoot().Append(
FILE_PATH_LITERAL("util/net/testdata/ascii_http_body.txt"));
FileReader reader;
ASSERT_TRUE(reader.Open(ascii_http_body_path));
builder.SetFileAttachment("minidump", "minidump.dmp", &reader, "");
static constexpr char kValue2[] = "this is not a file";
builder.SetFormData("minidump", kValue2);
std::unique_ptr<HTTPBodyStream> body(builder.GetBodyStream());
ASSERT_TRUE(body.get());
std::string contents = ReadStreamToString(body.get());
auto lines = SplitCRLF(contents);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
ASSERT_EQ(lines.size(), 9u);
auto lines_it = lines.begin();
const std::string& boundary = *lines_it++;
EXPECT_GE(boundary.length(), 1u);
EXPECT_LE(boundary.length(), 70u);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"minidump\"");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, kValue2);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, boundary);
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"one\"");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, "");
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, kValue1);
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(*lines_it++, boundary + "--");
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE} gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments. This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual, expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!) conversion tool is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py, and “git cl format” cleaned up its output. EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected” value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE, this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion. References: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65 https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713 Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727 Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
EXPECT_EQ(lines_it, lines.end());
}
TEST(HTTPMultipartBuilderDeathTest, AssertUnsafeMIMEType) {
HTTPMultipartBuilder builder;
FileReader reader;
// Invalid and potentially dangerous:
ASSERT_DEATH_CHECK(builder.SetFileAttachment("", "", &reader, "\r\n"), "");
ASSERT_DEATH_CHECK(builder.SetFileAttachment("", "", &reader, "\""), "");
ASSERT_DEATH_CHECK(builder.SetFileAttachment("", "", &reader, "\x12"), "");
ASSERT_DEATH_CHECK(builder.SetFileAttachment("", "", &reader, "<>"), "");
// Invalid but safe:
builder.SetFileAttachment("", "", &reader, "0/totally/-invalid.pdf");
// Valid and safe:
builder.SetFileAttachment("", "", &reader, "application/xml+xhtml");
}
} // namespace
} // namespace test
} // namespace crashpad