Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
// Copyright 2014 The Crashpad Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
|
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
|
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
|
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
|
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
|
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
|
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "util/posix/process_info.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-15 00:09:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
#include <time.h>
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-18 00:18:20 -04:00
|
|
|
|
#include <algorithm>
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
#include <set>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <string>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <vector>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-18 00:18:20 -04:00
|
|
|
|
#include "base/strings/stringprintf.h"
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
#include "build/build_config.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
test: Move util/test to its own top-level directory, test.
After 9e79ea1da719, it no longer makes sense for crashpad_util_test_lib
to “hide” in util/util_test.gyp. All of util/test is moved to its own
top-level directory, test, which all other test code is allowed to
depend on. test, too, is allowed to depend on all other non-test code.
In a future change, when crashpad_util_test_lib gains a dependency on
crashpad_client, it won’t look so weird for something in util (even
though it’s in util/test) to depend on something in client, because the
thing that needs to depend on client will live in test, not util.
BUG=crashpad:33
R=scottmg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1051533002
2015-03-31 17:44:14 -04:00
|
|
|
|
#include "test/errors.h"
|
2017-03-18 00:18:20 -04:00
|
|
|
|
#include "test/main_arguments.h"
|
2017-03-28 17:55:19 -04:00
|
|
|
|
#include "test/multiprocess.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "util/file/file_io.h"
|
2015-09-14 14:51:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
#include "util/misc/implicit_cast.h"
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 09:14:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
#if defined(OS_LINUX) || defined(OS_ANDROID)
|
|
|
|
|
#include "util/linux/direct_ptrace_connection.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "test/linux/fake_ptrace_connection.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
namespace crashpad {
|
|
|
|
|
namespace test {
|
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-15 00:09:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
void TestProcessSelfOrClone(const ProcessInfo& process_info) {
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
// There’s no system call to obtain the saved set-user ID or saved set-group
|
|
|
|
|
// ID in an easy way. Normally, they are the same as the effective user ID and
|
|
|
|
|
// effective group ID, so just check against those.
|
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE}
gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to
EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify
each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this
traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now
agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments.
This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual,
expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of
the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better
readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!)
conversion tool is
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py,
and “git cl format” cleaned up its output.
EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made
a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected”
value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other
code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ
and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE,
this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where
one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos
can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion.
References:
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison
https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65
https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713
Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.RealUserID(), getuid());
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
const uid_t euid = geteuid();
|
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE}
gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to
EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify
each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this
traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now
agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments.
This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual,
expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of
the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better
readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!)
conversion tool is
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py,
and “git cl format” cleaned up its output.
EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made
a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected”
value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other
code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ
and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE,
this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where
one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos
can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion.
References:
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison
https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65
https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713
Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.EffectiveUserID(), euid);
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.SavedUserID(), euid);
|
2017-03-14 13:05:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
const gid_t gid = getgid();
|
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE}
gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to
EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify
each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this
traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now
agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments.
This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual,
expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of
the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better
readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!)
conversion tool is
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py,
and “git cl format” cleaned up its output.
EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made
a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected”
value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other
code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ
and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE,
this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where
one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos
can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion.
References:
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison
https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65
https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713
Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.RealGroupID(), gid);
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
const gid_t egid = getegid();
|
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE}
gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to
EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify
each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this
traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now
agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments.
This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual,
expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of
the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better
readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!)
conversion tool is
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py,
and “git cl format” cleaned up its output.
EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made
a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected”
value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other
code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ
and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE,
this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where
one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos
can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion.
References:
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison
https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65
https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713
Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.EffectiveGroupID(), egid);
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.SavedGroupID(), egid);
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Test SupplementaryGroups().
|
|
|
|
|
int group_count = getgroups(0, nullptr);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_GE(group_count, 0) << ErrnoMessage("getgroups");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::vector<gid_t> group_vector(group_count);
|
|
|
|
|
if (group_count > 0) {
|
|
|
|
|
group_count = getgroups(group_vector.size(), &group_vector[0]);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_GE(group_count, 0) << ErrnoMessage("getgroups");
|
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE}
gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to
EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify
each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this
traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now
agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments.
This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual,
expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of
the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better
readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!)
conversion tool is
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py,
and “git cl format” cleaned up its output.
EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made
a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected”
value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other
code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ
and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE,
this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where
one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos
can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion.
References:
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison
https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65
https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713
Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(implicit_cast<size_t>(group_count), group_vector.size());
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::set<gid_t> group_set(group_vector.begin(), group_vector.end());
|
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE}
gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to
EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify
each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this
traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now
agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments.
This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual,
expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of
the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better
readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!)
conversion tool is
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py,
and “git cl format” cleaned up its output.
EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made
a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected”
value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other
code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ
and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE,
this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where
one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos
can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion.
References:
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison
https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65
https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713
Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.SupplementaryGroups(), group_set);
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Test AllGroups(), which is SupplementaryGroups() plus the real, effective,
|
|
|
|
|
// and saved set-group IDs. The effective and saved set-group IDs are expected
|
|
|
|
|
// to be identical (see above).
|
|
|
|
|
group_set.insert(gid);
|
|
|
|
|
group_set.insert(egid);
|
|
|
|
|
|
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE}
gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to
EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify
each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this
traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now
agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments.
This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual,
expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of
the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better
readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!)
conversion tool is
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py,
and “git cl format” cleaned up its output.
EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made
a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected”
value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other
code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ
and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE,
this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where
one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos
can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion.
References:
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison
https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65
https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713
Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.AllGroups(), group_set);
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The test executable isn’t expected to change privileges.
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(process_info.DidChangePrivileges());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if defined(ARCH_CPU_64_BITS)
|
2017-09-22 09:14:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(process_info.Is64Bit());
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
#else
|
2017-09-22 09:14:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(process_info.Is64Bit());
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Test StartTime(). This program must have started at some time in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
timeval start_time;
|
2017-03-15 00:09:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.StartTime(&start_time));
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(start_time.tv_sec == 0 && start_time.tv_usec == 0);
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
time_t now;
|
|
|
|
|
time(&now);
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_LE(start_time.tv_sec, now);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::vector<std::string> argv;
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.Arguments(&argv));
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-18 00:18:20 -04:00
|
|
|
|
const std::vector<std::string>& expect_argv = GetMainArguments();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// expect_argv always contains the initial view of the arguments at the time
|
|
|
|
|
// the program was invoked. argv may contain this view, or it may contain the
|
|
|
|
|
// current view of arguments after gtest argv processing. argv may be a subset
|
|
|
|
|
// of expect_argv.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// gtest argv processing always leaves argv[0] intact, so this can be checked
|
|
|
|
|
// directly.
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(expect_argv.empty());
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(argv.empty());
|
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE}
gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to
EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify
each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this
traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now
agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments.
This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual,
expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of
the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better
readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!)
conversion tool is
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py,
and “git cl format” cleaned up its output.
EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made
a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected”
value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other
code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ
and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE,
this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where
one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos
can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion.
References:
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison
https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65
https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713
Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(argv[0], expect_argv[0]);
|
2017-03-18 00:18:20 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_LE(argv.size(), expect_argv.size());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Everything else in argv should have a match in expect_argv too, but things
|
|
|
|
|
// may have moved around.
|
|
|
|
|
for (size_t arg_index = 1; arg_index < argv.size(); ++arg_index) {
|
|
|
|
|
const std::string& arg = argv[arg_index];
|
|
|
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE(
|
|
|
|
|
base::StringPrintf("arg_index %zu, arg %s", arg_index, arg.c_str()));
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_NE(expect_argv.end(), std::find(argv.begin(), argv.end(), arg));
|
2016-10-31 15:48:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-14 13:05:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
void TestSelfProcess(const ProcessInfo& process_info) {
|
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE}
gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to
EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify
each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this
traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now
agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments.
This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual,
expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of
the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better
readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!)
conversion tool is
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py,
and “git cl format” cleaned up its output.
EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made
a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected”
value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other
code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ
and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE,
this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where
one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos
can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion.
References:
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison
https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65
https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713
Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.ProcessID(), getpid());
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.ParentProcessID(), getppid());
|
2017-03-14 13:05:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-15 00:09:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
TestProcessSelfOrClone(process_info);
|
2017-03-14 13:05:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST(ProcessInfo, Self) {
|
|
|
|
|
ProcessInfo process_info;
|
2017-09-22 09:14:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
#if defined(OS_LINUX) || defined(OS_ANDROID)
|
|
|
|
|
FakePtraceConnection connection;
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(connection.Initialize(getpid()));
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.InitializeWithPtrace(&connection));
|
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.InitializeWithPid(getpid()));
|
|
|
|
|
#endif // OS_LINUX || OS_ANDROID
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
TestSelfProcess(process_info);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if defined(OS_MACOSX)
|
|
|
|
|
TEST(ProcessInfo, SelfTask) {
|
|
|
|
|
ProcessInfo process_info;
|
2017-09-22 09:14:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.InitializeWithTask(mach_task_self()));
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
TestSelfProcess(process_info);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST(ProcessInfo, Pid1) {
|
|
|
|
|
// PID 1 is expected to be init or the system’s equivalent. This tests reading
|
|
|
|
|
// information about another process.
|
|
|
|
|
ProcessInfo process_info;
|
2017-09-22 09:14:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
#if defined(OS_LINUX) || defined(OS_ANDROID)
|
|
|
|
|
FakePtraceConnection connection;
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(connection.Initialize(1));
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.InitializeWithPtrace(&connection));
|
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.InitializeWithPid(1));
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE}
gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to
EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify
each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this
traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now
agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments.
This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual,
expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of
the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better
readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!)
conversion tool is
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py,
and “git cl format” cleaned up its output.
EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made
a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected”
value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other
code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ
and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE,
this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where
one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos
can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion.
References:
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison
https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65
https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713
Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.ProcessID(), implicit_cast<pid_t>(1));
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.ParentProcessID(), implicit_cast<pid_t>(0));
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.RealUserID(), implicit_cast<uid_t>(0));
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.EffectiveUserID(), implicit_cast<uid_t>(0));
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.SavedUserID(), implicit_cast<uid_t>(0));
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.RealGroupID(), implicit_cast<gid_t>(0));
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.EffectiveGroupID(), implicit_cast<gid_t>(0));
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.SavedGroupID(), implicit_cast<gid_t>(0));
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(process_info.AllGroups().empty());
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-03-14 13:05:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-28 17:55:19 -04:00
|
|
|
|
class ProcessInfoForkedTest : public Multiprocess {
|
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
|
ProcessInfoForkedTest() : Multiprocess() {}
|
|
|
|
|
~ProcessInfoForkedTest() {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Multiprocess:
|
|
|
|
|
void MultiprocessParent() override {
|
|
|
|
|
const pid_t pid = ChildPID();
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 09:14:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
#if defined(OS_LINUX) || defined(OS_ANDROID)
|
|
|
|
|
DirectPtraceConnection connection;
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(connection.Initialize(pid));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ProcessInfo process_info;
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.InitializeWithPtrace(&connection));
|
|
|
|
|
#else
|
2017-03-28 17:55:19 -04:00
|
|
|
|
ProcessInfo process_info;
|
2017-09-22 09:14:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(process_info.InitializeWithPid(pid));
|
|
|
|
|
#endif // OS_LINUX || OS_ANDROID
|
2017-03-28 17:55:19 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
test: Use (actual, [un]expected) in gtest {ASSERT,EXPECT}_{EQ,NE}
gtest used to require (expected, actual) ordering for arguments to
EXPECT_EQ and ASSERT_EQ, and in failed test assertions would identify
each side as “expected” or “actual.” Tests in Crashpad adhered to this
traditional ordering. After a gtest change in February 2016, it is now
agnostic with respect to the order of these arguments.
This change mechanically updates all uses of these macros to (actual,
expected) by reversing them. This provides consistency with our use of
the logging CHECK_EQ and DCHECK_EQ macros, and makes for better
readability by ordinary native speakers. The rough (but working!)
conversion tool is
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/466727/1/rewrite_expectassert_eq.py,
and “git cl format” cleaned up its output.
EXPECT_NE and ASSERT_NE never had a preferred ordering. gtest never made
a judgment that one side or the other needed to provide an “unexpected”
value. Consequently, some code used (unexpected, actual) while other
code used (actual, unexpected). For consistency with the new EXPECT_EQ
and ASSERT_EQ usage, as well as consistency with CHECK_NE and DCHECK_NE,
this change also updates these use sites to (actual, unexpected) where
one side can be called “unexpected” as, for example, std::string::npos
can be. Unfortunately, this portion was a manual conversion.
References:
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md#binary-comparison
https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/77d6b173380332b1c1bc540532641f410ec82d65
https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/713
Change-Id: I978fef7c94183b8b1ef63f12f5ab4d6693626be3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/466727
Reviewed-by: Scott Graham <scottmg@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 00:35:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.ProcessID(), pid);
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(process_info.ParentProcessID(), getpid());
|
2017-03-28 17:55:19 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TestProcessSelfOrClone(process_info);
|
2017-03-14 13:05:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-28 17:55:19 -04:00
|
|
|
|
void MultiprocessChild() override {
|
|
|
|
|
// Hang around until the parent is done.
|
|
|
|
|
CheckedReadFileAtEOF(ReadPipeHandle());
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-03-14 13:05:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-28 17:55:19 -04:00
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
|
DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(ProcessInfoForkedTest);
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
2017-03-14 13:05:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-28 17:55:19 -04:00
|
|
|
|
TEST(ProcessInfo, Forked) {
|
|
|
|
|
ProcessInfoForkedTest test;
|
|
|
|
|
test.Run();
|
2017-03-14 13:05:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
Move some parts of ProcessReader (in snapshot) to ProcessInfo (in util).
Also, move ProcessArgumentsForPID() into ProcessInfo.
This change prepares for a TaskForPID() implementation that’s capable of
operating correctly in a setuid root executable. TaskForPID() belongs in
util/mach, but for its permission checks, it must access some process
properties that were previously fetched by ProcessReader in snapshot.
util can’t depend on snapshot. The generic util-safe process information
bits (Is64Bit(), ProcessID(), ParentProcessID(), and StartTime()) are
moved from ProcessReader to ProcessInfo (in util), where the current
ProcessReader can use it (as it’s OK for snapshot to depend on util),
and the future TaskForPID() in util can also use it. ProcessInfo also
contains other methods that TaskForPID() will use, providing access to
the credentials that the target process holds. ProcessArgumentsForPID()
is related, and is also now a part of ProcessInfo.
TEST=snapshot_test, util_test
R=rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727973002
2014-11-14 17:54:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace test
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace crashpad
|